CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourcedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-05

How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Distinct primes have distinct closures, so the spectrum is T0

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice.

Let $R$ be a commutative ring. Distinct prime ideals of $R$ have distinct closures in $Spec (R)$ . Equivalently, $Spec (R)$ is $T_{0}$ .

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A commutative ring $R$ , distinct prime ideals $p, q \subseteq R$ , and the Axiom of Choice.

[L1]

In a prime spectrum, $q$ is a specialisation of $p$ exactly when $p \subseteq q$ (Specialisation in a prime spectrum is reverse inclusion).

[A1]

A space is $T_{0}$ exactly when distinct points have distinct closures.

Proof

technique · direct

1.1L1given

If $\overline{{p}} = \overline{{q}}$ , then each point lies in the closure of the other. Hence each is a specialisation of the other, so [L1] gives both $p \subseteq q$ and $q \subseteq p$ . Therefore $p = q$ , contrary to the hypothesis.

2.1A1step 1.1

Thus distinct prime ideals have distinct closures. By [A1], this is exactly the $T_{0}$ property.

3.1step 2.1∎

Therefore $Spec (R)$ is $T_{0}$ .

Depends on

Specialisation in a prime spectrum is reverse inclusion

Distinct primes have distinct closures, so the spectrum is T0

Statement

Facts & Assumptions

Proof

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources