How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
If then
Statement
For all sets and , if then .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: sets and with ; the Axiom of Foundation, through the result cited as [L3].
holds if and only if or (, , , , and ).
, the singleton of , is the set whose only element is (The unordered pair and the singleton ).
There are no sets and with and (Under Foundation, for every set , there are no sets with , and there are no sets with ).
Proof
, so ; likewise .
By hypothesis the two sets are equal, so and ; hence or , and or .
If then both alternatives and fail, leaving and , which is impossible; therefore .
Remarks
- The general statement, and its special case for . This holds for all sets and is proved from Foundation. The corresponding clause for the natural numbers, that the successor is injective on , is part (P2) of The von Neumann naturals form a Peano system ↗, which proves it by a different route that does not use Foundation.