Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-22
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Adjoint of a densely defined operator

Definition

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). Let T be a densely defined linear operator on H, with domain D(T) dense in H (Densely defined, closed and closable operators, and cores, Dense, nowhere dense and codense subsets of a topological space, and the criterion by basic open sets). Since D(T) is dense, and since H is complete (Hilbert space), every bounded linear functional on the normed space (D(T),∥⋅∥) (A bounded linear operator between normed spaces) extends uniquely to a bounded linear functional φ~ on H of the same norm, by setting φ~(z)=lim⁡nφ(zn) for any sequence zn∈D(T) with zn→z in H; the limit exists because φ is bounded on a dense subspace and H is complete, and it does not depend on the sequence because a bounded functional is uniformly continuous.

A vector y∈H belongs to the adjoint domain D(T∗) when the linear functional φy:D(T)→C, φy(x)=⟨Tx,y⟩, is bounded on (D(T),∥⋅∥). In that case Hilbert space Riesz representation (Riesz representation for Hilbert spaces) applied to the extension φy~ produces a unique vector T∗y∈H with T∗y is the unique w∈H such that ⟨Tx,y⟩=⟨x,w⟩for all x∈D(T), equivalently φy~(z)=⟨z,T∗y⟩ for all z∈H. The map T∗:D(T∗)→H, y↦T∗y, is the adjoint of T.

Well-definedness. The functional φy is linear in x for each y, so its domain of boundedness D(T∗) is a linear subspace: if φy,φy′ are bounded so is φay+by′ for scalars a,b, because the first-variable-linear convention gives φay+by′=a‾ φy+b‾ φy′. On D(T∗) the map T∗ is linear: if y,y′ are represented by w,w′, then ay+by′ is represented by aw+bw′, since ⟨x,aw+bw′⟩=a‾⟨x,w⟩+b‾⟨x,w′⟩; the representing vector is unique. By Riesz representation for the Hilbert space H a vector w∈H is determined by the values ⟨z,w⟩ with z ranging over H, and those values are determined by the functional φy~. Equivalently, if w,w′ both represent φy, then ⟨x,w−w′⟩=0 for every x∈D(T); density of D(T) and continuity of the inner product extend this equality to every x∈H, and taking x=w−w′ gives w=w′. Finally only ambient-norm boundedness of φy on D(T) is required: no extension, no closure and no closedness of T is presupposed.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources