Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite background groupoid and cocycle-weighted gauging data

Definition

Let K be a finite ordered simplicial complex. A finite background field groupoid F(K) is a small category of declared fields and invertible gauge equivalences, with finitely many isomorphism classes and finite automorphism groups. Its automorphisms retain the multiplicities declared by the field model. A cocycle/action weight is a function WK:Ob⁡F(K)→U(1) constant on every gauge arrow. Its normalized gauging sum is

ZK(WK)=∑[x]∈π0F(K)WK(x)∣Aut⁡F(K)(x)∣.

For the finite 2-group specialization, fix finite (G,A,ρ,β) and let B(K) be the explicit background gauge 2-groupoid: objects are flat G-edge cochains and A-face cochains satisfying δaB=a∗β; 1-arrows retain raw vertex/edge parameters (g,λ), and 2-arrows are vertex cochains t with λ′−λ=δagt, for fixed g. The raw 1-composition is the displayed τ-corrected composition; its associator is β(ki,hi,gi). Write π0 for object equivalence classes, π1(B(K),x) for 2-isomorphism classes of 1-automorphisms, and π2(B(K),x) for 2-automorphisms of the identity 1-arrow. For a phase weight WK constant on all 1-arrows, define the higher normalized gauging sum

ZK(2)(WK)=∑[x]∈π0B(K)WK(x)∣π2(B(K),x)∣∣π1(B(K),x)∣.

Distinct raw gauge labels are not identified by equality of their effects on fields. The higher sum retains π2; it is not ordinary groupoid integration of the 1-truncation. In particular a point has higher weight ∣A∣/∣G∣ for unit action, whereas an ordinary field groupoid BG has weight 1/∣G∣.

For a subcomplex L⊆K and fixed field s on L, relative fields and arrows use exact restriction to s, identity vertex gauge labels on L, zero edge gauge labels on L, and zero vertex 2-gauge labels on L. Their higher sum uses the same π2/π1 prescription. Ordinary groupoids are included as 2-groupoids with only identity 2-arrows, so this prescription reduces to the preceding ordinary sum. A higher cocycle supplies an admissible scalar action only after its evaluated weight is proved invariant; nontrivial boundary line-bundle actions require their own transgression data and are not silently treated as scalar functions.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the finite field models and invariant phase weights in the Definition.

[F1]

Finite background gauge 2-groupoid gives the full raw 1- and 2-arrow conventions and relative cochains.

[F2]

Coherence and stabilizers of finite background gauge 2-groupoids proves all coherence, equivalence and finiteness assertions for this model, with finite groups π1,π2 and point values G,A.

[F3]

Finite groupoid cardinality and homotopy-fiber integration defines ordinary finite groupoid integration with retained automorphism groups.

Proof

1.1givenF2F3algebra

By [F2], the higher field model and its relative versions are finite 2-groupoids, so their component sets and both homotopy groups are finite. Every denominator ∣π1∣ is a positive integer. By [F3] the same holds for the component and automorphism data of the ordinary model. Thus both displayed sums are finite.

1.2givenF1F2F3construct

An equivalence arrow has a reverse and associators; conjugation by it identifies the 2-isomorphism classes of 1-automorphisms at its endpoints. Whiskering with it and its reverse similarly identifies 2-automorphisms of the identity arrows; the inverse composites are identified with identities by the specified invertible 2-arrows. These constructions are inverse on the respective classes, so ∣π1∣ and ∣π2∣ are constant on each component. The invariant WK therefore makes the higher summand independent of representative. In the ordinary case this is exactly invariance of automorphism orders under conjugation.

1.3givenF2F3algebra

At a point [F2] gives π1=G, π2=A, hence the higher unit-weight sum is ∣A∣/∣G∣. When all 2-arrows are identities, π2 is trivial and π1 is the ordinary automorphism group, so the higher prescription equals the ordinary one.

2.1step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3∎

The finite, representative-independent sums in steps 1.1–1.3 supply the stated ordinary and higher gauging data, including the point normalization and relative prescription.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources