Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Gapped identical-scalar forward-amplitude data

Definition

Use natural units c=ℏ=1 and metric η=diag⁡(−1,1,1,1). An external scalar datum consists of a spin-zero species assigned a mass m>0 and elastic two-particle threshold s=4m2. This is a mathematical input package; it does not construct a one-particle scattering state or a scattering matrix. For real on-shell momenta p1,p2 incoming and p3,p4 outgoing, with pj2=−m2 and p1+p2=p3+p4, define

s=−(p1+p2)2,t=−(p1−p3)2,u=−(p1−p4)2.

Then s+t+u=4m2. The forward slice is the complex-valued function A(s)=A(s,0,4m2−s) obtained by analytically continuing the identical-scalar 2→2 amplitude to t=0. The crossing action on this slice is s↦4m2−s, which exchanges s and u. Assume A(s)=A(4m2−s) wherever both sides are defined.

For context, define the physical elastic kinematic region

Pm={(s,t,u)∈R3:s>4m2,  −(s−4m2)≤t≤0,  u=4m2−s−t}.

When supplied, the full physical amplitude is a map Aphys:Pm→C; its analytic continuation used in the forward data above is a separate supplied part of the input, with upper boundary value A(s+i0)=Aphys(s,0,4m2−s) for s>4m2. For (s,t,u)∈Pm, put x=1+2t/(s−4m2)∈[−1,1]. For each integer ℓ≥0, define the normalized Legendre polynomial Pℓ:C→C by

Pℓ(x)=12ℓℓ!dℓdxℓ(x2−1)ℓ,

and let aℓ:(4m2,∞)→C be the complex partial-wave coefficient function in this channel. When a full partial-wave expansion is asserted on the physical angular interval, require the partial sums of the right-hand side below to converge uniformly in x∈[−1,1] for each fixed s>4m2 to the supplied physical amplitude. Use the normalization

Aphys(s,t,u)=16πss−4m2∑ℓ=0∞(2ℓ+1)Pℓ ⁣(1+2ts−4m2)aℓ(s),Pℓ(1)=1.

For the forward sign alone, convergence of the series at x=1 suffices. The downstream forward-positivity result uses the optical-theorem sign Im⁡A(s+i0)≥0 for s>4m2 as input; a full partial-wave realization is not inferred from this definition. In the displayed normalization, the sign follows if the forward series converges and the supplied partial waves obey Im⁡aℓ(s)≥∣aℓ(s)∣2≥0 for every s>4m2 and every ℓ.

Put ν0=2m2 and v=s−2m2, so u−2m2=−v. Choose finitely many real numbers pj∈(0,4m2)∖{2m2} and real residues rj, and set

P(s)=∑j(rjs−pj+rj4m2−pj−s).

Each summand pair is the real simple-pole principal part at s=pj and its s↔u crossing partner; hence P(4m2−s)=P(s). These poles lie off the two-particle cuts. Define the pole-subtracted forward function B(v)=A(2m2+v)−P(2m2+v). Assume B is holomorphic on

Ων0=C∖((−∞,−ν0]∪[ν0,∞)),

real analytic there, meaning B(v‾)=B(v)‾, and has finite upper and lower boundary values on both cuts except at their endpoints. Here the two-particle gap is the open interval (−ν0,ν0) in the v variable; no massless pole or cut reaches the forward point t=0.

Require additionally that B extends continuously from each open half-plane onto every compact segment of either real cut bank avoiding ±ν0. This is an extra admissibility assumption on the supplied data, not a consequence of finite pointwise boundary values or a claim about every quantum field theory.

Assume the exact high-energy condition B(w)=o(∣w∣2) uniformly as ∣w∣→∞ in the closed upper half-plane, including upper cut-bank limits. In particular this holds on the large upper semicircles after any fixed bounded horizontal translation. For ν≥ν0, define the absorptive density ρ(ν)=Im⁡B(ν+i0). Require ρ to be nonnegative and Riemann integrable on every compact subinterval of [ν0,∞), and require ∫ν0∞ρ(ν)ν−3 dν to converge as a finite improper Riemann integral. For every real v with ∣v∣<ν0, require the integrals along both sides of the two cuts of [B(x)−B(0)]/[x2(x−v)], with boundary values taken from the upper and lower half-planes, to exist as finite improper Riemann limits. Require also that the small endpoint arcs at ±ν0 for this integrand vanish in the contour limit. Since P is real off its poles, ρ(ν)=Im⁡A(2m2+ν+i0) for ν>ν0 on the right cut.

The normalized forward Taylor coefficients are cn=B(2n)(0)/(2n)! for integers n≥1. They have units (mass)−4n; ν0 has units (mass)2. No sign is assigned here to a generic off-shell Lagrangian coefficient.

Remarks

This definition treats analyticity, crossing, growth, pole subtraction, and the forward optical-theorem sign as supplied amplitude data. It proves no physical model exists and no full unitary S-matrix realizes arbitrary such data. It excludes massless forward poles/cuts, massless gauge or gravitational exchange, and nonlocal amplitudes with different high-energy growth.

For completeness, changing a finite value at one endpoint preserves Riemann integrability and the integral: for any partition isolate that endpoint in an interval of length h; the possible change in upper and lower sums is bounded by a fixed finite bound times h, which tends to zero. The same equality holds on every finite truncation, and hence on each existing improper limit. This convention does not require a limit of B or of its absorptive part at threshold.

Dependency tree · 0 levels

Nothing. This result depends on no other item in the library.

Sources