How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Gapped identical-scalar forward-amplitude data
Definition
Use natural units and metric . An external scalar datum consists of a spin-zero species assigned a mass and elastic two-particle threshold . This is a mathematical input package; it does not construct a one-particle scattering state or a scattering matrix. For real on-shell momenta incoming and outgoing, with and , define
Then . The forward slice is the complex-valued function obtained by analytically continuing the identical-scalar amplitude to . The crossing action on this slice is , which exchanges and . Assume wherever both sides are defined.
For context, define the physical elastic kinematic region
When supplied, the full physical amplitude is a map ; its analytic continuation used in the forward data above is a separate supplied part of the input, with upper boundary value for . For , put . For each integer , define the normalized Legendre polynomial by
and let be the complex partial-wave coefficient function in this channel. When a full partial-wave expansion is asserted on the physical angular interval, require the partial sums of the right-hand side below to converge uniformly in for each fixed to the supplied physical amplitude. Use the normalization
For the forward sign alone, convergence of the series at suffices. The downstream forward-positivity result uses the optical-theorem sign for as input; a full partial-wave realization is not inferred from this definition. In the displayed normalization, the sign follows if the forward series converges and the supplied partial waves obey for every and every .
Put and , so . Choose finitely many real numbers and real residues , and set
Each summand pair is the real simple-pole principal part at and its crossing partner; hence . These poles lie off the two-particle cuts. Define the pole-subtracted forward function . Assume is holomorphic on
real analytic there, meaning , and has finite upper and lower boundary values on both cuts except at their endpoints. Here the two-particle gap is the open interval in the variable; no massless pole or cut reaches the forward point .
Require additionally that extends continuously from each open half-plane onto every compact segment of either real cut bank avoiding . This is an extra admissibility assumption on the supplied data, not a consequence of finite pointwise boundary values or a claim about every quantum field theory.
Assume the exact high-energy condition uniformly as in the closed upper half-plane, including upper cut-bank limits. In particular this holds on the large upper semicircles after any fixed bounded horizontal translation. For , define the absorptive density . Require to be nonnegative and Riemann integrable on every compact subinterval of , and require to converge as a finite improper Riemann integral. For every real with , require the integrals along both sides of the two cuts of , with boundary values taken from the upper and lower half-planes, to exist as finite improper Riemann limits. Require also that the small endpoint arcs at for this integrand vanish in the contour limit. Since is real off its poles, for on the right cut.
The normalized forward Taylor coefficients are for integers . They have units ; has units . No sign is assigned here to a generic off-shell Lagrangian coefficient.
Definition references
Remarks
This definition treats analyticity, crossing, growth, pole subtraction, and the forward optical-theorem sign as supplied amplitude data. It proves no physical model exists and no full unitary -matrix realizes arbitrary such data. It excludes massless forward poles/cuts, massless gauge or gravitational exchange, and nonlocal amplitudes with different high-energy growth.
For completeness, changing a finite value at one endpoint preserves Riemann integrability and the integral: for any partition isolate that endpoint in an interval of length ; the possible change in upper and lower sums is bounded by a fixed finite bound times , which tends to zero. The same equality holds on every finite truncation, and hence on each existing improper limit. This convention does not require a limit of or of its absorptive part at threshold.
Dependency tree · 0 levels
Nothing. This result depends on no other item in the library.
Sources
- Allan Adams, Nima Arkani-Hamed, Sergei Dubovsky, Alberto Nicolis, and Riccardo Rattazzi, Causality, Analyticity and an IR Obstruction to UV Completion
- Claudia de Rham, Scott Melville, Andrew J. Tolley, and Shuang-Yong Zhou, Positivity Bounds for Scalar Theories
- Ivano Basile, Luca Buoninfante, Francesco Di Filippo, Benjamin Knorr, Alessia Platania, and Anna Tokareva, Lectures in Quantum Gravity