How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The Axiom of Choice
Definition
The Axiom of Choice (AC) is the following statement.
Every family of nonempty sets has a choice function (Choice function).
Written out: for every set all of whose members are nonempty, there exists a function with domain satisfying for all .
An equivalent formulation is that a product of nonempty sets is nonempty: if for every , then . Here is the set of functions with domain such that for every ; when a family of nonempty sets is indexed by itself, such an is precisely a choice function for it.
Definition references
Remarks
- This is an axiom, not a theorem. The results on this page prove equivalences and consequences from AC; they do not assume an independence theorem in order to define or use it. The proved choice ledger: hypotheses, equivalences, and upper bounds ↗ records only the implications and proof costs established by local results.
- Being an axiom, AC carries no well-definedness obligation, which is why this
item has no
justified_by. - The case of a family listed by a natural number, which is the finite case once finiteness is defined, is a theorem of ZF and needs no axiom (Every natural-number-indexed list of nonempty sets has a choice function on its family of values ↗). AC is exactly the extension of that theorem to arbitrary index sets, and the gap between the two is not a matter of degree: Russell's shoes and socks ↗ exhibits the difference concretely.
- "ZFC" abbreviates ZF together with AC. A result that invokes AC should say so where it is stated, so that a reader can tell which theorems are choice-free; that bookkeeping is the purpose of The proved choice ledger: hypotheses, equivalences, and upper bounds ↗. The proved choice cost of the ultrafilter lemma ↗ records the narrower, locally proved upper bound for the ultrafilter lemma. Its exact reverse implications wait for the later Boolean-algebra and symmetric-model development.