How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Reflection-positive Euclidean field data
Definition
Use the two-dimensional hierarchy and bilinear distribution-pairing convention defined earlier on this page. Write Euclidean coordinates as , set , and let . For , let be the smooth compactly supported complex test functions on invariant under permutations of their two-dimensional argument blocks; set the degree-zero test space to . The reflection of a degree- test function is the antilinear map
For a finite family with and (using ), define The tensor is a compactly supported smooth test function on ; for the term means . The hierarchy is reflection-positive on the positive-time test algebra when for every such finite family. This scalar form is conjugate-linear in its first polynomial variable and linear in its second; when expressed using the imported convention that an inner product is linear in its first variable, the corresponding form is obtained by reversing the two arguments. No quotient or Hilbert-space completion is asserted here.
Reflection positivity is only this positivity condition. Euclidean covariance, block symmetry, clustering, regularity, and any linear-growth hypothesis remain distinct clauses; this definition alone is not an Osterwalder–Schrader reconstruction theorem.