Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-11-05 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

P(z)-intertwining map

Definition

Let A be an abelian group, let à contain A as a subgroup, let V be a strongly A-graded Möbius or conformal vertex algebra, and let W1,W2,W3 be strongly Ã-graded generalized V-modules, with the decompositions and operators specified in def-cft-hlz-strongly-graded-generalized-module. Fix z∈C×. Write W‾3=∏h∈CW3,[h] for the formal completion and πh for its generalized-weight projections. A P(z)-intertwining map of type (W3;W1,W2) is a linear map I:W1⊗W2→W‾3 whose Ã-degrees add and such that, for each h∈C and w1,w2, πh−mI(w1⊗w2)=0 for all sufficiently large integers m. For every v∈V and w1,w2, it satisfies x0−1δ ⁣(x1−zx0)Y3(v,x1)I(w1⊗w2)=z−1δ ⁣(x1−x0z)I(Y1(v,x0)w1⊗w2)+x0−1δ ⁣(z−x1−x0)I(w1⊗Y2(v,x1)w2). Here δ(t)=∑r∈Ztr, x0,x1 are independent formal variables and z is fixed. In the three delta factors the binomial powers are expanded respectively in nonnegative powers of z, x0 and x1. The two right-hand expressions mean coefficientwise application of I to the ordinary module series. The left-hand side is interpreted in W‾3: for homogeneous v of weight d, its mode vn sends W3[q] into W3[q+d−n−1], so the lower-truncation condition makes each fixed output projection of any mode sum with indices bounded above a finite sum. It also satisfies, for j=−1,0,1, L(j)I(w1⊗w2)=I(w1⊗L(j)w2)+∑i=0j+1(j+1i)ziI(L(j−i)w1⊗w2). There is no L(-1)-derivative axiom for I.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Work over C with the formal-variable, grading, and branch conventions in the linked definitions.

[F1]

Logarithmic intertwining operator: Let V be a Möbius or conformal vertex algebra and W1,W2,W3 generalized V-modules. A logarithmic intertwining operator of type (W3;W1,W2) is a linear map Y(⋅,x)⋅:W1⊗W2→W3[log⁡x]{x}, written Y(w1,x)w2=∑n∈C∑k≥0(w1)n;kw2x−n−1(log⁡x)k, satisfying: for each w1,w2,n, (w1)n+m;kw2=0 for all sufficiently large integers m, with the bound independent of k; the intertwining Jacobi identity; ∂xY(w1,x)=Y(L(−1)w1,x); and [L(j),Y(w1,x)]=∑i=0j+1binom⁡(j+1,i)xiY(L(j−i)w1,x) for j=−1,0,1. Each coefficient of x−n−1 is a finite polynomial in log x; no uniform degree bound over all n is imposed. In the strongly graded setting it is grading-compatible when coefficient degrees add. The no-log subspace consists of logarithmic intertwining operators with all coefficients for k>0 zero, retaining the stated integer-string truncation. It agrees with the usual ordinary intertwining-operator space over a conformal vertex algebra of CFT type when W1,W2,W3 are ordinary modules, meaning grading-restricted generalized modules with diagonalizable L(0); without that lower bound, no uniform real-part truncation is asserted.

[F2]

Grading-restricted generalized module: Let V be a conformal vertex algebra of CFT type and M a left V-module. Write LM(0) for the coefficient determined by YM(ω,z)=∑n∈ZLM(n)z−n−2. For h∈C, define the generalized LM(0)-eigenspace M[h]={m∈M:(LM(0)−h)Nm=0 for some integer N≥1}. The module is grading-restricted generalized if M=⨁h∈CM[h], every M[h] is finite dimensional, and the real parts of its nonzero generalized weights are bounded below. The direct sum means each vector has only finitely many generalized-weight components. This convention explicitly adds finite-dimensionality and a lower bound to the generalized-eigenspace decomposition; those conditions are not consequences of the module Jacobi identity.

[F3]

Strongly graded generalized module in the HLZ setting: Let V be an ordinary non-super vertex algebra in the sense of def-vertex-algebra-state-field. A Möbius vertex algebra is V with operators L(-1),L(0),L(1) representing sl(2), with L(-1) equal to translation, and satisfying [L(j),Y(v,x)]=∑i=0j+1binom⁡(j+1,i)xiY(L(j−i)v,x) for j=−1,0,1. A Möbius module has the corresponding sl(2)-action and field commutator identities. A conformal vertex algebra supplies these operators through its Virasoro field. For a generalized module write L(0)s for the diagonal operator acting by h on W[h]; the nilpotent part is L(0)−L(0)s. Let A be an abelian group and suppose V has compatible integer-weight and A-gradings V=⊕n∈Z,α∈AV(n)(α), each component finite dimensional and lower truncated in n for each α, 1∈V(0)(0), vmV(β)⊂V(α+β), and L(j)V(α)⊂V(α) for j=−1,0,1. In the conformal case require ω∈V(2)(0). For an abelian group A~⊃A, a generalized module W=⊕h∈C,β∈A~W[h](β) is strongly Ã-graded when the gradings are compatible, each W[h](β) is finite dimensional, W[h+k](β)=0 for all sufficiently negative integers k for each h,β, vmW(β)⊂W(α+β), and L(j)W(β)⊂W(β) for j=−1,0,1. Morphisms preserve both gradings and the V-action.

Proof

1.1givenF1F2algebra

The target completion is the product of generalized weight spaces, so an image may have infinitely many weights only subject to the stated lower truncation along integer weight strings.

2.1givenF1F2F3step 1.1algebra∎

The P(z)-Jacobi identity specializes the formal intertwiner identity at z; the three sl(2) brackets are separate axioms, and no derivative identity is included.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources