Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-11-04 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Retained and omitted variation spaces

Definition

All Banach spaces below are real complete normed vector spaces. A C1 Banach manifold is a Hausdorff space with charts to open subsets of real Banach spaces whose transition maps are C1; a map is C1 when its chart representatives have Fréchet derivatives that are continuous in operator norm. In charts, DFx is the bounded linear map for which F(x+h)=F(x)+DFxh+o(∥h∥). Tangent vectors are model vectors identified by derivatives of chart transitions, and Tx∗ is the space of bounded real-linear functionals on Tx. A topological direct sum T=V⊕W means that addition V×W→T is a bounded linear isomorphism.

Let X and Xr be specified smooth manifolds, possibly with boundary, and let the full and retained fields be sections of specified smooth bundles over them. Choose integers k≥1 sufficient for the chosen action and boundary data. Let C and Cr be specified C1 Banach manifolds of admissible Ck full and retained fields, respectively; their boundary conditions and gauge fixing, or their smooth gauge quotients, are part of these spaces. Let S:C→R and I:Cr→C be C1, and fix ϕ∈Cr with ψ=I(ϕ). The admissible full variations are exactly TψC, and the retained variations are Vret(ϕ):=im⁡DIϕ⊆TψC. Suppose a closed subspace Vomit(ϕ)⊆TψC has been specified such that TψC=Vret(ϕ)⊕Vomit(ϕ) as a topological direct sum. The reduced action is Sr:=S∘I. Its derivative is the continuous covector DSr∣ϕ=(DIϕ)∗(DS∣ψ), where (DIϕ)∗:Tψ∗C→Tϕ∗Cr is the continuous-dual pullback. For every w∈TϕCr, DSr∣ϕ(w)=DS∣ψ(DIϕw), so DSr∣ϕ=0 if and only if DS∣ψ annihilates Vret(ϕ). The reduced covector and the restriction of DS∣ψ have different domains in general; they are not identified unless DIϕ identifies TϕCr with its image. The omitted first variation is the restriction of DS∣ψ to Vomit(ϕ). The stated tangent-space split, boundary conditions, and gauge treatment are part of the data; without a declared complement there is no defined omitted variation space.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Differentiable configuration spaces Cr,C, a differentiable map I:Cr→C, and a differentiable action S:C→R.

[A1]

At each configuration under consideration, the direct sum is topological and both summands are closed. Boundary and gauge conditions are encoded in the configuration manifolds and their tangent spaces; no additional boundary or gauge variations are silently admitted.

Proof

1.1givenA1algebra

By the direct-sum hypothesis, each v∈TψC has a unique expression v=vret+vomit with the two terms in the declared summands. Restricting a continuous covector to either summand is therefore well-defined.

2.1givenA1algebra∎

In local charts, write I(x+h)=I(x)+Lh+rI(h) with rI(h)=o(∥h∥), and S(y+k)=S(y)+Mk+rS(k) with rS(k)=o(∥k∥), where L=DIϕ and M=DS∣ψ. Then k=Lh+rI(h)=O(∥h∥), so rS(k)=o(∥h∥); substitution gives S(I(x+h))=S(I(x))+MLh+o(∥h∥). Thus DSr∣ϕ=M∘L=(DIϕ)∗(DS∣ψ). Its vanishing is equivalent to DS∣ψ annihilating im⁡DIϕ=Vret(ϕ), while the restriction to Vomit(ϕ) remains independent.

Dependency tree · 0 levels

Nothing. This result depends on no other item in the library.

Sources