How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Kaluza–Klein product and warped reduction data
Classical two-derivative metric reduction on smooth compact internal spaces, with separate unwarped fixed-background and warped Einstein-frame ansätze. Source, flux, dilaton, higher-derivative, loop, and retained-modulus effects are included only when explicitly declared.
Definition
Let , , let be a smooth Lorentzian -manifold of signature , and let be a smooth compact boundaryless Riemannian -manifold. Write . In coordinate expressions use and for this same internal metric. The fixed unwarped product metric ansatz is For an internal-only warped ansatz, let and set The metrics are required to be nondegenerate; their signatures are respectively Lorentzian on and Riemannian on . The symbols and are only coordinate aliases of the already specified and ; no second internal metric is introduced.
For the coefficient calculations below, additionally take the -dimensional action to be with and, in units, . The coefficient calculation excludes other action terms. A variable-volume product ansatz, when used, is the block-diagonal metric where is a smooth Riemannian metric on for each and there are no mixed components. Its Jordan-frame internal volume is When and , the corresponding lower-dimensional Einstein metric is defined by , for a fixed reference volume .
For a specified smooth finite-rank real or complex vector bundle , write for its space of smooth sections. For a specified linear internal kinetic operator , an internal mode is a smooth section satisfying for a declared eigenvalue . A finite mode ansatz is a field expansion for a declared finite index set and declared sections . Here a Laplace-type operator is a second-order differential operator with smooth coefficients and principal symbol , using the symbol convention . Equivalently, in a local frame its second-order part is ; the remaining terms have order at most one. This fixes the positive-principal-symbol sign; the scalar model is . Formal self-adjointness or nonnegativity is additional data when required, not part of the principal-symbol condition alone. For this operator a zero or harmonic mode means a section in . This definition makes no claim that such a finite family is complete or that a finite mode ansatz is a consistent truncation.
These ansätze are declared data, not consequences of compactness, harmonicity, or the Einstein equations. Every reduction must also specify any coordinate periods, field normalizations, frame and dilaton convention, retained-modulus dependence, source localization or smearing, boundary conditions, and retained orders in , the string coupling, derivatives, and field modes. In ten dimensions use the declared convention , with and ; when the constant asymptotic dilaton is absorbed into the physical coupling, . These are the conventions of the supplied supergravity-definition item.
Definition references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The manifold, metric, action, boundary conditions, frame, dilaton shift, and field dependence specified in the statement.
Supergravity Conventions And Normalizations: in natural units the item declares mostly-plus signature, , when the constant asymptotic dilaton is absorbed, , and . Here is a metric and is a dimensionless scalar; they are distinct objects.
, has no boundary, the metrics are smooth and nondegenerate, and the warp factors depend only on internal coordinates for the fixed-background warped calculation. For the ten-dimensional constant-dilaton comparison set , so in the convention of [F1].
For the moduli Weyl calculation, , the variable-volume metric is the declared , is smooth, and external boundary terms vanish or are discarded under the declared boundary conditions.
For the ten-dimensional frame conversion in step 1.3, , , , is constant, the metric is an unwarped product, and .
Proof
In the fixed product case the metric is block diagonal, so its determinant is ; the Lorentzian square-root convention gives . Thus internal and external volume factors separate in the stated Einstein–Hilbert action.
In the warped case the external block is multiplied by in each of directions and the internal block by in each of directions. Therefore . The part of the scalar curvature multiplying the external scalar curvature is ; terms containing derivatives of or contain no factor . Hence the coefficient of is .
Under [A3], implies . In four external dimensions a constant Weyl rescaling gives . On six internal dimensions . Since , the string-frame coefficient equals . This is only a constant-dilaton frame conversion; it makes no statement about terms involving derivatives or dynamics of .
For the variable-volume ansatz in the Definition, the coefficient of is . Under with , the curvature term transforms with coefficient . The conformal transformation also produces derivatives of ; they are modulus-derivative terms and are not removed by making the Einstein coefficient constant.
The identity is a coefficient calculation for the displayed ansatz and two-derivative Einstein term only. A varying warp factor, localized sources, flux constraints, dilaton dependence, higher- corrections, loops, or nonlinear mode couplings can change the equations and source omitted modes. Therefore harmonicity alone does not establish that the ansatz uplifts every reduced solution.
Depends on
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Sources
- Thomas W. Grimm and Jan Louis, The effective action of N=1 Calabi-Yau orientifolds, arXiv:hep-th/0403067v3
- Steven B. Giddings, Shamit Kachru, and Joseph Polchinski, Hierarchies from Fluxes in String Compactifications, arXiv:hep-th/0105097v2
- Alex S. Arvanitakis, Olaf Hohm, Chris Hull, and Victor Lekeu, Homotopy Transfer and Effective Field Theory II: Strings and Double Field Theory, arXiv:2106.08343v2