Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Etale neighbourhoods and elementary etale neighbourhoods of a point

Definition

Let S be a scheme (Schemes) and let s∈S be a point, with residue field κ(s) (The residue field at a point of an affine scheme).

An 'etale neighbourhood of (S,s) is a pair (U,u) consisting of a scheme U, a morphism of schemes φ:U→S that is 'etale (Étale morphism of schemes) and a point u∈U with φ(u)=s. One writes φ:(U,u)→(S,s). A morphism of 'etale neighbourhoods f:(V,v)→(U,u) of (S,s) is a morphism of S-schemes (Schemes and morphisms over a base) f:V→U with f(v)=u.

The 'etale neighbourhood (U,u)→(S,s) is elementary if the canonical map of residue fields κ(s)→κ(u) is an isomorphism, that is, if κ(u)=κ(s).

Three conventions belong to the definition. First, no affineness is required of U; in the arguments on this page the neighbourhoods produced are affine when this is useful, and the definition above is the general one of Stacks Definition 37.35.1. Second, the point u need not be closed in U, and the morphism U→S is required to be 'etale as a morphism, not merely 'etale at the point u; a morphism that is 'etale only on an open neighbourhood of u gives an 'etale neighbourhood after replacing U by that neighbourhood. Third, if U⊆S is an open neighbourhood of s, then (U,s)→(S,s) is an 'etale neighbourhood, and it is elementary since the residue field at s is unchanged; the composition of two 'etale neighbourhoods of (S,s) is again one, and the composition of elementary ones is elementary because both residue field maps are isomorphisms.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources