Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Dyonic Reissner-Nordström metric and field domains

Definition

Let M,qe,qm∈R be length parameters and put Q2:=qe2+qm2. Let J⊂(0,∞) be open and require f(r):=1−2Mr+Q2r2≠0(r∈J). On the smooth product MJ:=Rx0×Jr×S2, use S2={(X,Y,Z)∈R3:X2+Y2+Z2=1} with its subspace topology (Euclidean spheres and closed balls as subspaces of Rn). Specify the smooth structure by the sphere atlas of The Schwarzschild exterior model datum: domain, metric, mass parameter and time orientation, Definition (b): for ε=±1, delete pε=(0,0,ε) and use σε(X,Y,Z)=(X,Y)/(1−εZ). For u=(u1,u2) and h=u12+u22, its inverse is σε−1(u)=(2u1,2u2,ε(h−1))/(1+h); the transition is u↦u/h on h>0. These rational maps are smooth on their domains. The product atlas consists of (x0,r,p)↦(x0,r,σε(p)) on R×J×(S2∖{pε}); its transitions leave x0,r fixed and apply the displayed sphere transition. The product is Hausdorff and second countable by the subspace topology from R2×R3, whose rational balls give a countable basis. These charts specify its maximal smooth atlas, including when J is empty. The inclusion of S2 into R3 is smooth with injective differential in these parametrizations; its induced unit round metric is γS2 (The round metric on the sphere as an induced metric). Orient S2 by its outward unit normal: for p∈S2 and u,v∈TpS2, define (ωS2)p(u,v):=det⁡(p,u,v). Thus ωS2 is the positive area form of γS2, and in the polar chart X=sin⁡θcos⁡ϕ, Y=sin⁡θsin⁡ϕ, Z=cos⁡θ it is sin⁡θ dθ∧dϕ. The dyonic RN datum is g=−f(r) dx0⊗dx0+f(r)−1 dr⊗dr+r2γS2,F=−qer2 dx0∧dr+qmωS2. Here x0 and r have units of metres, angles on S2 are dimensionless, and M,qe,qm have units of metres. The metric components are dimensionless in length coordinates; the nonzero coordinate components of F have units inherited from their coordinate Jacobians. Use the orientation dx0∧dr∧ωS2.

The set J may have several connected components. On {f>0} choose the time orientation ∂x0; on {f<0} choose ∂r. These are smooth timelike fields on their respective open subsets because g(∂x0,∂x0)=−f<0 when f>0 and g(∂r,∂r)=f−1<0 when f<0. Since f has no zero on MJ, this defines a smooth time orientation on the whole product. The sphere area form and the displayed two-form are global on S2.

Let N,S denote the north and south poles. On UN:=S2∖{S} and US:=S2∖{N}, respectively, local potential one-forms are AN=−qer dx0+qm(1−cos⁡θ) dϕ,AS=−qer dx0−qm(1+cos⁡θ) dϕ. Each displayed potential extends smoothly over its named included pole: (1−cos⁡θ)dϕ is smooth at N and (1+cos⁡θ)dϕ is smooth at S. Direct differentiation gives dAN=dAS=F on the respective patches. Their overlap difference is 2qm dϕ; it is local potential data, not a global real gauge function on the entire sphere. The definition assumes no U(1) bundle or charge quantization. To verify pole smoothness, use local coordinates u=X,v=Y near each pole. There dϕ=(u dv−v du)/(u2+v2). Near N, 1−cos⁡θ=(u2+v2)/(1+Z), so (1−cos⁡θ)dϕ=(u dv−v du)/(1+Z) is smooth. Near S, 1+cos⁡θ=(u2+v2)/(1−Z), so (1+cos⁡θ)dϕ=(u dv−v du)/(1−Z) is smooth. The denominators are nonzero on the respective named patches.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources