Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-11-04 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite classifying-approximation and coherence input

Definition

Write U(r)={U∈Mr(C):U∗U=I} and u(r)={X∈Mr(C):X∗+X=0}. A smooth Hermitian rank-r bundle is a smooth rank-r complex vector bundle with a smoothly varying positive Hermitian inner product; its topological version uses a continuous bundle and continuous metric. A unitary connection is a complex-linear connection satisfying the Leibniz rule and X⟨s,t⟩=⟨∇Xs,t⟩+⟨s,∇Xt⟩ for smooth sections s,t and vector fields X. Write ∇Xs=(∇s)(X); its curvature is the End⁡(E)-valued two-form F∇(X,Y)=[∇X,∇Y]−∇[X,Y]. A symmetric polynomial of degree m is a symmetric m-linear form on u(r), invariant here under simultaneous conjugation by U(r); evaluation on curvature means pc(F∇,…,F∇) using exterior products and the stated normalization. A unitary bundle isomorphism is a smooth complex-linear fiberwise isometry (or a continuous one for topological bundles). Let BU(r)=Grr(C∞) be the direct limit of finite complex Grassmannians with its direct-limit CW topology, and let γr→BU(r) be the universal topological Hermitian rank-r bundle. For a finite-dimensional Hausdorff second-countable smooth manifold M without boundary of dimension d, integers r,m≥1, and a real-valued symmetric U(r)-invariant m-linear form pc:u(r)m→R with a specified characteristic normalization, a finite classifying-approximation and coherence input consists of the following data. The normalization includes every required 2πi factor. For unitary connections ∇0,∇1 on the same Hermitian bundle, use the affine path ∇t=∇0+t(∇1−∇0) and the transgression convention CS⁡pc(∇0,∇1)=m∫01pc(∇1−∇0,F∇t,…,F∇t) dt, which satisfies dCS⁡pc=pc(F∇1)−pc(F∇0) by Explicit Chern–Simons transgression between two connections.

First, it includes a finite-dimensional smooth manifold N, a smooth Hermitian rank-r bundle F→N with unitary connection ∇F, and a continuous map u:N→BU(r) inducing isomorphisms on πj for j≤d and a surjection on πd+1 (with chosen basepoints). A specified unitary isomorphism of topological bundles F≅u∗γr makes u a classifying map for F. For every supplied smooth Hermitian bundle E→M with unitary connection ∇, it includes a smooth map f:M→N and a unitary bundle isomorphism E≅f∗F.

Second, for every two such presentations (N0,F0,∇F0,u0,f0) and (N1,F1,∇F1,u1,f1) of the same (E,∇), it includes a finite-dimensional smooth common approximation N′ with a (d+1)-connected continuous classifying map u′:N′→BU(r), a smooth Hermitian bundle F′→N′ whose underlying bundle is isomorphic to u′∗γr, and a unitary connection ∇′ on F′. It includes smooth comparison maps ai:Ni→N′ and unitary bundle isomorphisms Fi≅ai∗F′. Put ∇iE=(ai∘fi)∗∇′ using these isomorphisms. The data further include a smooth homotopy h:M×[0,1]→N′ from a0f0 to a1f1 and a unitary isomorphism h∗F′≅pr⁡M∗E whose endpoint identifications are the given presentations. Transport the pullback connection h∗∇′ through this isomorphism to a connection ∇~ on pr⁡M∗E, and write ∇t for its restriction to M×{t}. Put Th=∫01pc(F∇~), contracting with ∂t and integrating in the increasing t direction. For every unitary connection ∇ on E, the supplied coherence form λ∈Ω2m−2(M) satisfies the exact equation −Th+CS⁡pc(∇0E,∇)−CS⁡pc(∇1E,∇)=dλ, where CS⁡pc is the normalized path transgression of Explicit Chern–Simons transgression between two connections. If 2m−1>d, all forms of degree 2m−1 on M vanish, so this identity is automatic with zero left side.

Finally, each approximation used when 2m−1≤d satisfies H2m−1(N;R)=0. When 2m−1>d, the corresponding group on M vanishes by dimension; no vanishing of H2m−1(N;R) is required. These are explicitly supplied inputs for the conditional construction and uniqueness argument; this definition does not assert that they exist for every M,E.

Remarks

The existence of the finite approximations, the common-refinement system, the odd-degree cohomology vanishing and the coherent transgression comparison are not proved by this definition. The differential-refinement item remains escalated until these inputs are supplied with a local existence argument.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources