How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Interior, closure, boundary, exterior, derived set and isolated point in a topological space
Definition
Let be a topological space (Topology on a set, open and closed sets, clopen sets, the closed-set axiomatisation, and the coarser/finer comparison), let and let . Neighbourhoods are as in Neighbourhood of a point and neighbourhood base, with this library's convention that a neighbourhood need not be open, so a neighbourhood need not be open.
- The interior of is .
- The closure of is .
- The exterior of is .
- The boundary of is .
- is a limit point (accumulation point) of if every neighbourhood of satisfies . The set of limit points of is the derived set .
- is an isolated point of if and some neighbourhood of satisfies .
Both operators are well posed, and the two names are justified rather than asserted. The interior is a union of open sets, hence open by (T2), it is contained in , and it contains every open : so is the largest open subset of . The family being intersected in the definition of is nonempty, since is closed and contains , so the intersection is a set; it is closed by (C2) of Topology on a set, open and closed sets, clopen sets, the closed-set axiomatisation, and the coarser/finer comparison, it contains , and it is contained in every closed : so is the smallest closed superset of . In particular
and is open if and only if , and closed if and only if , in each case because one inclusion is automatic and the other says exactly that belongs to the family in question.
Interior and closure are exchanged by complementation. For every ,
Indeed is a bijection between the open subsets of and the closed supersets of , and it turns unions into intersections (Topology on a set, open and closed sets, clopen sets, the closed-set axiomatisation, and the coarser/finer comparison); applying complementation to the first identity gives the second. So , and every statement about interiors has a mirror statement about closures.
The pointwise description of the interior. if and only if is a neighbourhood of . If then is an open set with ; conversely a neighbourhood relation with open puts in the union defining . The corresponding description of the closure is proved as the next item, because it is the statement that does the work in every later proof.
is the disjoint union of the three regions. Since , the three sets , and are pairwise disjoint and their union is . This is recorded again, with the identities for interior and closure of unions and intersections, in the lemma two items below.
Remarks
-
The boundary is symmetric in and its complement: , because by the complementation identity above. Hence , and is closed, being an intersection of two closed sets.
-
A limit point of need not lie in , and a point of need not be a limit point of . The points of that are not limit points of are exactly its isolated points, directly from the two definitions. The relation is a theorem, proved next, not a restatement.
-
These are the metric notions when the topology is a metric topology. For a metric space the definitions of Interior, closure, boundary, limit point, isolated point and dense subset of a metric space are stated with balls in place of neighbourhoods, and the balls around are a neighbourhood base at ; the identification is carried out where metrizable spaces are defined, later on this page, and it is what allows metric examples to be quoted here without reproof.