How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Invertible sheaf of cartier divisor
Definition
Let be a Cartier divisor on a scheme , represented by meromorphic units with regular-unit ratios on the overlaps (Cartier divisor). The subsheaf is the one of Sheaf total quotient rings. Define an -submodule sheaf of by Equivalently, on each chart, These are meromorphic functions whose possible poles are cancelled by the local equation of .
This construction is well defined. It is closed under addition and regular scalar multiplication. The condition is local, so compatible sections glue in and retain it by the sheaf locality axiom (A sheaf on a topological space). On an overlap the unit gives . Replacing equations by unit multiples or restricting to a refinement gives the same subsheaf; any two representations of the same Cartier divisor agree locally in precisely this sense.
On , the map , , has inverse multiplication by . It is injective because is a unit in and is injective, and it is surjective by the defining formula. Thus the sheaf is locally free of rank one, hence invertible (Invertible sheaves).
The sign convention allows poles along an effective divisor: , whereas . If is effective this last subsheaf is exactly its ideal sheaf of Effective cartier divisor. For the zero divisor the equation is and . On the empty scheme the formula gives its unique module sheaf, which satisfies the local rank-one condition vacuously.