How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Right hyperderived functor of a complex
Definition
Let be additive and left exact between abelian categories. For a bounded-below complex with supplied Cartan–Eilenberg resolution , define the right hyperderived object relative to by Additivity preserves the two square-zero equations and the commuting square, so the total differential squares to zero. Each diagonal is finite, and the canonical finite-biproduct comparison identifies with .
The totalization lemma gives a bounded-below termwise injective replacement . With its DC or supplied homotopy-extension qualification, this is a K-injective model, so the same formula is . Without comparison data the subscript is retained: the definition alone asserts neither independence nor a choice of a resolution for every complex. This extends Right derived objects relative to supplied injective resolution data: an object in degree zero resolved in one column gives precisely of that object.
If and the supplied resolution are zero, every value is zero. For lower bound , the values vanish for , and the total diagonal at has one term. Translating the first index to changes the total degree to , not the original degree in the formula.