How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Basis and subbasis for a topology, and the topology generated by a family of sets
Definition
Let be a topological space (Topology on a set, open and closed sets, clopen sets, the closed-set axiomatisation, and the coarser/finer comparison).
A family is a basis for if every open set is a union of members of : for every there is with . Equivalently, and this is the form used in proofs,
The two forms say the same thing. If every open is such a union and , then lies in one of the sets united, which is a member of inside . Conversely, if the displayed condition holds then , since each such is contained in and each lies in one of them. Note that , so the empty open set is covered by the empty subfamily and needs no member of . The members of a basis are called basic open sets.
The topology generated by a family. Let be any family of subsets of . Then
is a topology on , it contains , and it is contained in every topology on that contains . It is called the topology generated by , and is a subbasis for a topology when .
This is well posed, and the obligation is discharged here. The collection being intersected is nonempty, because is a topology on containing ; so the intersection is an intersection of a nonempty family of subsets of and is a set. It is a topology: and lie in every topology on , hence in the intersection, which is (T1); if then is a subfamily of each in the collection, so lies in each and hence in the intersection, which is (T2); and the same argument with gives (T3). It contains because every in the collection does, and it is contained in each such because an intersection is contained in each of its members. So is the coarsest topology on containing (Topology on a set, open and closed sets, clopen sets, the closed-set axiomatisation, and the coarser/finer comparison), and in particular it is uniquely determined by .
Neither notion is intrinsic to the family alone. " is a basis for " and " is a subbasis for " are relations between a family and a topology, not properties of the family. The question of which families are a basis for some topology, and how the topology generated by a subbasis is computed from it, is settled by the next item.
Remarks
-
Every topology is a basis for itself, so a basis always exists; the point of a basis is to be smaller and more explicit than , and the point of a subbasis is to be smaller still at the cost of one round of finite intersections.
-
Two extremes of the generated topology. is the indiscrete topology, since is a topology containing the empty family and is contained in every topology. At the other end, is the discrete topology.
-
Generation is monotone and idempotent. If then every topology containing contains , so ; and because is itself a topology containing . Both are used silently below.