How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Type Iia Potential Gauge Transformations
Local potential gauge transformations in the source-free massless Hamilton convention. The verification is kinematic and does not establish a global gauge group, gerbe data, quantization, or source transformation law.
Definition
On a smooth ten-dimensional local patch , take smooth real potentials , , with and , and let be smooth one-, zero-, and two-form gauge parameters. The Hamilton massless type IIA potential transformations are The gauge-invariant local field strengths are , , and . The auxiliary strength transforms by and is generally not invariant. In the length-valued coordinates of the adopted action, potential components are dimensionless; gauge-parameter components have dimension length so that each displayed potential shift is dimensionless.
Definition references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Smooth gauge parameters, , and the potential/field-strength conventions stated above.
Supergravity Conventions And Normalizations (current batch-56 carrier and current ready Step 1 record inspected; its stated hypotheses match this use): ordinary exterior differentiation and wedge products are used in Lorentzian ten dimensions.
Type Iia Two Derivative Supergravity Action adopts the local definitions of used here.
The exterior derivative squares to zero: on smooth forms.
Verification
Under , by [F2]. Under , .
With , the change in is , by [F1] and . The change in is , since degrees 1 and 3 anticommute in [A1]. Thus is unchanged.
The transformation leaves invariant by steps 1.1 and 2.1; step 2.1 also gives the stated transformation of . This is the stated local gauge invariance of the field-strength data; it does not by itself assert invariance of a global action with boundary or source terms.