Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A two-component truncated RG flow with linear mixing

Example

Take a supplied fixed-weight quotient V=Q6 of complex dimension two, with ordered basis representatives O1,O2 of engineering weight six, a cutoff Λ>0, and a scheme whose renormalization-scale interval is J=(0,∞). In natural units use the dimensionless coefficient vector C(t)=(C1(t),C2(t))T and the formal quotient expression Ltrunc(t)=C1(t)O1+C2(t)O2Λ2,t=log⁡(μ/μ0). Supply the constant complex-linear coefficient-flow matrix A=(−110−2) and initial vector C(0)=(1,1)T. In real coordinates the supplied vector field is β(t,ρ2(C))=ρ2(AC) on R×R4. The resulting truncated system is C′=AC, and its solution on all t∈R is C(t)=(2e−t−e−2te−2t). The matrix is supplied as part of this mathematical example; it is not calculated from a QFT and gives no estimate for omitted terms.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The supplied two-dimensional complex coefficient quotient and basis, the RG interval J=(0,∞), matrix A, and initial value C(0)=(1,1)T in the Example.

[F1]

Finite renormalization schemes and Wilson coefficient vectors: the coefficient space is CN, its realification ρN is an isometry to R2N, and t=log⁡(μ/μ0) is dimensionless.

[F2]

Local well-posedness of a supplied truncated coupled RG system: a supplied continuous vector field locally Lipschitz in the coefficient state has unique local solutions, unique agreement on common intervals, and the stated local continuous-dependence estimate.

Verification

technique · direct differentiation, followed by the local well-posedness theorem

Given: [F1], [F2], and the supplied data in the Example.

1.1givenalgebra

At t=0, the displayed vector has components 2−1=1 and e0=1, so it satisfies the stated initial condition.

2.1givenstep 1.1algebra

Differentiating gives C1′(t)=−2e−t+2e−2t and C2′(t)=−2e−2t. The first component of AC is −C1+C2=−2e−t+2e−2t, and the second is −2C2=−2e−2t. Thus the displayed curve solves C′=AC for every real t.

3.1F1F2step 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

For Δ=C−D∈C2, the triangle inequality and (a−b)2≥0 for a,b≥0 give ∣−Δ1+Δ2∣2≤(∣Δ1∣+∣Δ2∣)2≤2(∣Δ1∣2+∣Δ2∣2). Also ∣−2Δ2∣2=4∣Δ2∣2. Adding these bounds gives ∥AΔ∥22≤2∣Δ1∣2+6∣Δ2∣2≤6∥Δ∥22. By the isometry ρ2, the real vector field is globally Lipschitz with constant 6 and is continuous. Theorem [F2] gives uniqueness on every common interval. The displayed solution exists on all R, so it is the unique global solution of this supplied system.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels