Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A non-invertible direct sum in Vec_Z2

Example

Let G=Z2={0,1} with addition modulo 2. Let Vec⁡G be the category of finite-dimensional complex G-graded vector spaces W=W0⊕W1, with grade-preserving linear maps and tensor product (W⊗U)c=⨁a+b=cWa⊗CUb. Its tensor unit is δ0=C in grade 0; write δ1=C in grade 1. The simple objects are δ0,δ1, with δa⊗δb≅δa+b. The object D=δ0⊕δ1 satisfies D⊗D≅2δ0⊕2δ1. For any W, its left and right duals are the graded vector space W∗ with (W∗)a=(W−a)∗. The left evaluation and coevaluation have types ev⁡L:W∗⊗W→δ0 and coev⁡L:δ0→W⊗W∗, with ev⁡L(ϕ⊗w)=ϕ(w) and coev⁡L(1)=∑a,iea,i⊗ea,i. The right evaluation and coevaluation have types ev⁡R:W⊗W∗→δ0 and coev⁡R:δ0→W∗⊗W, with ev⁡R(w⊗ϕ)=ϕ(w) and coev⁡R(1)=∑a,iea,i⊗ea,i, where ea,i is a basis of Wa and ea,i its dual basis, placed in grade −a of W∗. Evaluations vanish on homogeneous pairs whose degrees do not sum to 0. The canonical associator is vector-space rebracketing. These formulas give both dual orientations; δ0 has itself as both duals with identity maps.

Thus D is non-invertible although each of its two simple summands is tensor-invertible. The object D is reducible; this example does not assert the existence of a non-invertible simple object or a physical defect realization.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The finite group Z2 under addition modulo 2 and finite-dimensional complex graded vector spaces.

[F1]

Finite semisimple fusion data for non-invertible defects: a finite semisimple fusion category is a finite semisimple rigid monoidal category with bilinear tensor product and simple unit; rigidity requires both left and right duals with evaluation and coevaluation maps of the displayed orientations satisfying both snake identities. An object is tensor-invertible only if it has a two-sided tensor inverse.

Verification

1.1givenalgebra

Every graded vector space is the direct sum of its two finite-dimensional homogeneous components, each of which is a finite direct sum of one-dimensional graded lines. Thus the category is semisimple with exactly two simple isomorphism classes, represented by δ0 and δ1; its Hom spaces are finite-dimensional and its kernels and cokernels inherit the grading. The displayed tensor product is bilinear and has unit δ0. Its associator is the ordinary vector-space rebracketing map, which preserves degree; the two pentagon composites send every pure tensor to the same rebracketed tensor, and the unit triangle follows from the canonical identifications with C⊗W and W⊗C. The unit δ0 is simple.

1.2givenF1algebra

The four dual maps displayed in the Example preserve degree: each evaluation pairs only a component of degree a with its dual component of degree −a, and each coevaluation is a sum of tensors of total degree 0. With the vector-space associator and unit identifications, the two left snake composites act by w↦∑a,iea,i(w)ea,i=w and ϕ↦∑a,iϕ(ea,i)ea,i=ϕ. The two right snake composites act by the same contractions, with evaluation and coevaluation in the reversed map orientations: w↦∑a,iea,i(w)ea,i=w and ϕ↦∑a,iϕ(ea,i)ea,i=ϕ. Thus every object has both left and right duals, and the category has the fusion properties in [F1].

2.1givenstep 1.1algebra

Distributing the tensor product over direct sums gives (δ0⊕δ1)⊗(δ0⊕δ1)≅(δ0⊗δ0)⊕(δ0⊗δ1)⊕(δ1⊗δ0)⊕(δ1⊗δ1)≅2δ0⊕2δ1, since δa⊗δb≅δa+b.

3.1F1step 1.1algebra∎

Any object X has the form δ0⊕a⊕δ1⊕b for nonnegative integers a,b. Hence D⊗X≅(a+b)δ0⊕(a+b)δ1. If a+b=0 this is the zero object; if a+b>0 it has a nonzero grade-1 summand. In neither case is it isomorphic to the unit δ0. Therefore D has no right tensor inverse and is non-invertible by [F1], while δ0 and δ1 each have themselves as two-sided inverses.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources