How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
One-loop electron-muon QED threshold matching and running
The source-reported one-loop decoupling-subtraction running of the electromagnetic coupling in QED with an electron and a muon; no experimental value, all-orders result, or model-independent threshold claim.
Example
Use natural units and Minkowski signature . In four spacetime dimensions assign mass dimensions , , , , , , and . For , regard , , and as formal perturbative fields, with no classical-solution regularity or nonperturbative operator domain assumed. The potential is a real one-form and has components . The fields are four-component complex Dirac spinors; use Clifford matrices satisfying and the Dirac adjoint . At each fixed renormalization scale in an active interval, let and use for fields of charge , with gauge kinetic term . For a real dimensionless gauge parameter , the convention is and . Define the dimensionless running coupling by . The decoupling-subtraction (DS) convention uses minimal subtraction within each interval of active charged fields, removes a charged field from the low-energy theory below its threshold, and matches the coupling continuously at that threshold. Set as the low-energy boundary condition. The source-reported one-loop DS flow has two active Dirac fields for , one for , and none for . For , define and . For positive evaluation scale of mass dimension one, require for every when ; for , require for every and for every . The corresponding one-loop solutions are: and The two expressions agree continuously at . These are solutions of the supplied one-loop renormalization-group equations; they are not measured values, exact all-orders predictions, or numerical error estimates.
Example references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The QED field content and conventions in the Example, positive masses , a positive low-energy coupling , the source-reported piecewise one-loop DS beta equations and boundary conditions, and an evaluation scale for which the displayed solution remains positive.
Finite renormalization schemes and Wilson coefficient vectors: the renormalization scale is distinct from the cutoff, and its logarithm relative to a reference scale in is dimensionless.
Finite-order EFT threshold matching map: the matching map takes high-energy coefficient data to lower-energy coefficient data and identifies the selected renormalized amplitudes through the declared truncation with the same infrared regulator.
Burgess, full EFT review, §4.1.4, equation (85) and its following boundary conditions: the source reports above , between and , and zero below , with continuity at and . This is a one-loop perturbative input, not an empirical observation. The first branch of printed equation (86) has an apparent typographical error: its denominator conflicts with the equation (85) flow and the stated low-energy boundary condition. The Verification derives the branch directly from (85) and that boundary condition.
The QED field content and DS threshold convention in the Example are the selected model assumptions. No measured value of either mass or coupling is supplied.
The one-loop beta equations are used as a truncated source-reported calculation. Higher loops and higher-dimension operators are omitted, with no numerical bound asserted.
Verification
On an interval with fixed active-field count , put for any fixed reference scale in that interval. By [F3], . Since , differentiation of its reciprocal gives . Integrating between two scales in this interval yields the corresponding affine function of .
Between and , take and use the boundary value . Step 1.1 gives for .
At , the low-energy value is . The DS boundary condition sets the high-energy coupling equal to this value at the threshold. Above it , so integrating step 1.1 from to gives for .
Setting in the upper expression removes its last logarithm and gives exactly the lower expression at the threshold. Setting in the lower expression recovers . Thus the piecewise one-loop solution satisfies both stated boundary conditions and is continuous at the threshold.