Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Split two-group interval gluing with a nontrivial action

Example

Let G=Z2, A=Z3, ρ1(t)=−t, and β=0. Let K be the ordered interval with vertices 0<1<2 and edges 01,12, decomposed into those two edges with intersection the vertex 1. Give every field unit weight. Each edge and the full interval have higher gauging sum 3/2. Each relative edge amplitude at the unique boundary field is 1. The gluing contraction has boundary mass 3/2 and gives 3/2 again; discarding that second gauge stabilizer would change the contraction.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the split finite data, interval decomposition and unit weights.

[F1]

Finite 2-group homotopy gauging and cochain gluing gives c(K)=∣A∣V−E/∣G∣V, relative factor c(K)/c(L), and higher gluing.

Verification

1.1givenF1algebra

A single edge has V=2,E=1, hence c=3/4 and two edge-label backgrounds, giving Z=3/2. The full two-edge interval has V=3,E=2, hence c=3/8 and four independently chosen edge-label backgrounds, again giving Z=3/2. There are no faces or tetrahedra imposing further conditions.

2.1givenF1algebra∎

The shared point has c=3/2 and one background. Each relative edge has two extensions, with relative normalizer (3/4)/(3/2)=1/2, so its amplitude is 1. The boundary contraction is (3/2)⋅1⋅1=3/2, equal to the full sum. The sign action remains in the gauge transformations; the count uses the complete higher formula, which applies to this nontrivial action.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels