Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A point retains the second gauge stabilizer

Example

Let K consist of one vertex. Take G=Z2, A=Z3, trivial action and β=0, with unit phase weight. There is one background object, two distinct raw 1-automorphisms and three 2-automorphisms of each. The higher gauging sum is 3/2. Identifying arrows by their effects on the singleton object set would give 1; retaining G but discarding 2-arrows would give 1/2.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the one-vertex complex and finite data of the Example.

[F1]

Finite 2-group homotopy gauging and cochain gluing gives point mass ∣A∣/∣G∣ and the full gauge normalization.

Verification

1.1givenF1algebra

There are no edges or faces, so the only background is empty. A raw 1-arrow has one freely chosen G-label and no edge labels, giving two arrows. A 2-arrow preserves that label and is any of the three vertex A-labels, since its coboundary has no edges. Thus π1=Z2 and π2=Z3.

2.1givenF1algebra∎

The higher mass is 3/2 by [F1]. The quotient by induced object functions has only the identity, of mass 1; the ordinary groupoid with only the two raw G-arrows has automorphism order 2, of mass 1/2. These distinct values demonstrate the retained higher stabilizer.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels