Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-11-05 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Exact chiral free-boson stress tensor and vertex OPE

Example

Let P=C[x1,x2,…] be the polynomial space of Rank-one Heisenberg oscillator fields and vacuum space, and let a−n=xn⋅, an=n ∂xn for n≥1, with a0=0. Use the finite-particle domain P: each polynomial contains finitely many monomials and variables, and every fixed coefficient of a normally ordered mode product acts by a finite sum. The exact imported theorem The rank-one Heisenberg vacuum space is a conformal VOA of central charge one verifies that these data give an algebraic conformal VOA of CFT type with conformal vector ω=12x12, central charge 1, and modes L(n)=12∑k:akan−k:. This imported theorem is used at its exact polynomial, algebraic scope; it supplies no Hilbert completion, convergent operator product, compactification, or noncompact path-integral measure.

For the vertex-field extension, let V=⨁γ∈RP∣γ⟩ be the algebraic direct sum of charge-labelled copies of P. Define p∣γ⟩=γ∣γ⟩ and Eα∣γ⟩=∣γ+α⟩, so pEα−Eαp=αEα and EαEβ=Eα+β. For the oscillator current a(z)=∑n∈Zanz−n−1, set J(z)=p/z+a(z) and ∂X(z)=−iJ(z). Define the charge field, on the finite-particle domain, by the formal normally ordered expression Vα(z):=Eαzαpexp⁡ ⁣(α∑n≥1a−nnzn)exp⁡ ⁣(−α∑n≥1annz−n),α∈R. The symbol zαp acts on ∣γ⟩ as zαγ∣γ⟩; powers are fixed on a simply connected radial chart avoiding 0. Normal ordering places all creation modes a−n to the left of annihilation modes an. Let Ω=∣0⟩ be the charge-zero oscillator vacuum. Define ε:V→C to select the coefficient of Ω in the charge-zero summand and to send nonzero charges and positive oscillator-degree monomials to zero. For radially ordered insertions ∣z1∣>⋯>∣zN∣>0, set C(α1,z1;…;αN,zN):=ε ⁣(Vα1(z1)⋯VαN(zN)Ω). This is an algebraic zero-mode prescription, not a path-integral expectation. Define the chiral contraction shorthand by ⟨X(z)X(w)⟩contr=−log⁡(z−w) on the chosen branch for ∣z∣>∣w∣; it is a Wick contraction, not a full vacuum expectation. Its oscillator part is −log⁡(1−w/z), while the charge factor zαp supplies the remaining zαβ in the vertex product.

The stress field is T(z):=−12:∂X(z)∂X(z):=12:J(z)J(z):. Products are expanded formally in the radial region ∣z∣>∣w∣>0, with branch data as in Radially ordered operator product expansion. In the stress formulas, ∼ denotes only the principal part specified by the stress-tensor datum. The vertex product in step 1.4 includes the full normally ordered factor and its formal Taylor expansion in s=z−w around w≠0. These are coefficientwise identities, with no analytic convergence or full CFT existence assertion.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The finite-particle oscillator domain, the charge-labelled algebraic extension, normal ordering as stated above, and the radial expansion region ∣z∣>∣w∣>0.

[F1]

Rank-one Heisenberg oscillator fields and vacuum space: P=C[x1,x2,…], a−n=xn⋅, an=n∂xn, a0=0, and the current is a(z)=∑anz−n−1.

[F2]

The rank-one Heisenberg vacuum space is a conformal VOA of central charge one: the oscillator data in [F1] give an algebraic conformal vertex algebra with conformal vector ω=12x12, central charge 1, and modes L(n)=12∑k∈Z:akan−k:. Its polynomial modes are finite on each fixed polynomial; the theorem makes no Hilbert or analytic-convergence claim.

[F3]

Holomorphic stress-tensor data in a plane CFT: the stress principal part is c/(2(z−w)4)+2T(w)/(z−w)2+∂wT(w)/(z−w), with radial residues on the declared formal domain.

[F4]

Radially ordered operator product expansion: ∣z∣>∣w∣ is the expansion region, and a formal OPE is coefficientwise data rather than a convergence assertion.

[A1]

The charge extension is the algebraic direct sum V=⨁γ∈RP∣γ⟩, with p∣γ⟩=γ∣γ⟩, Eα∣γ⟩=∣γ+α⟩, and vertex fields and vacuum coefficient as defined in the Example.

[A2]

The Wick contraction convention is ⟨X(z)X(w)⟩contr=−log⁡(z−w) on the chosen branch. Differentiation gives ⟨J(z)J(w)⟩contr=(z−w)−2 and ⟨J(z)Vα(w)⟩contr=α(z−w)−1Vα(w). Its oscillator part is the radial series ∑n≥1(w/z)n/n=−log⁡(1−w/z).

Verification

technique · direct

Given: [F1]–[F4], [A1]–[A2], and the algebraic charge-field definitions.

1.1F1A2algebra

For m,n>0 or m,n<0, the operators in [F1] commute. For m>0,n=−r<0, [am,an]=[m∂xm,xr]=mδm,rI; reversing m,n changes the sign. Thus [am,an]=mδm,−nI for all integer indices, including a0=0. The current contraction is ∑n≥1nz−n−1wn−1=z−2∑n≥1n(w/z)n−1=1(z−w)2. The geometric-series identity is valid in the formal radial region.

1.2F1F2F3algebra

The double contraction in T(z)T(w) pairs the two J's in two ways, giving 12(z−w)−4. The single contractions leave :J(z)J(w):(z−w)2=2T(w)(z−w)2+∂T(w)z−w+O(1), because the formal Taylor expansion gives J(z)=J(w)+(z−w)∂J(w)+O((z−w)2). Hence T(z)T(w)∼1/2(z−w)4+2T(w)(z−w)2+∂T(w)z−w. Comparing with [F3] gives c/2=1/2, so c=1, in agreement with [F2].

1.3F3A2algebra

Pairing each of the two currents in T(z)=12:J(z)J(z): with Vα(w) gives the double-pole coefficient 12(αz−w)2Vα(w)=α22Vα(w)(z−w)2. The two single contractions give α:J(z)Vα(w):z−w=∂wVα(w)z−w+O(1), indeed, write Vα(z)=EαzαpCα(z)Aα(z), with Cα and Aα its creation and annihilation exponentials. Differentiating the four factors gives ∂zVα=αEαzαp[(pz+∑n≥1a−nzn−1)CαAα+Cα(∑n≥1anz−n−1)Aα]=α:JVα:, where the normal ordering places creation modes left and the zero mode to the right of Eαzαp. The remaining terms are regular, so T(z)Vα(w)∼α22Vα(w)(z−w)2+∂wVα(w)z−w, and h(Vα)=α2/2.

1.4A1A2F4algebra

Write the annihilation exponential of Vα(z) as eAα(z), Aα(z)=−α∑n≥1anz−n/n, and the creation exponential of Vβ(w) as eBβ(w), Bβ(w)=β∑n≥1a−nwn/n. Their commutator is central: [Aα(z),Bβ(w)]=−αβ∑n≥1(w/z)nn=αβlog⁡(1−w/z). The formal Baker–Campbell–Hausdorff identity therefore contributes (1−w/z)αβ. Commuting zαp past Eβ contributes zαβ, and EαEβ=Eα+β. The product of scalar factors is zαβ(1−w/z)αβ=(z−w)αβ; after extracting these scalars, the remaining zero-mode factor is Eα+βzαpwβp, and the oscillator factors are the normally ordered creation and annihilation exponentials. More explicitly, define the bilocal normally ordered factor Nα,β(z,w):=Eα+βzαpwβpexp⁡ ⁣(∑n≥1a−nn(αzn+βwn))exp⁡ ⁣(−∑n≥1ann(αz−n+βw−n)). The exact radial identity is Vα(z)Vβ(w)=(z−w)αβNα,β(z,w), where the scalar power is expanded as zαβ(1−w/z)αβ on the chosen branch. For the local expansion set s=z−w, expand every (w+s)q binomially in s/w, and put Dk(w):=1k!(∂zkNα,β)(w,w) for integers k≥0. These are formal coefficient fields: on a fixed input polynomial the annihilation exponential is finite, and at each fixed oscillator degree the creation coefficients and their derivatives are finite sums. Consequently the Taylor expansion is well defined coefficientwise and gives the full generalized-power OPE Vα(w+s)Vβ(w)=sαβ∑k≥0skDk(w),D0(w)=Vα+β(w). This local re-expansion uses ∣s∣<∣w∣ as its binomial-expansion convention, distinct from the original radial expansion; neither is an assertion of numerical convergence of the field series. The leading fused term alone is sαβVα+β(w); the k≥1 fields retain all regular descendants.

2.1A1A2step 1.4algebra

For each pair i<j, commuting the annihilation exponential of the outer field Vαi(zi) through the creation exponential of Vαj(zj) contributes (1−zj/zi)αiαj by the central-commutator calculation of step 1.4. Moving the outer zero-mode factor past the later charge shift contributes ziαiαj. Their product is (zi−zj)αiαj in the radial region ∣zj/zi∣<1. After all such pairwise commutations, ε kills every positive oscillator-degree term and every nonzero total charge. Therefore C(α1,z1;…;αN,zN)={∏1≤i<j≤N(zi−zj)αiαj,∑iαi=0,0,∑iαi≠0. The powers use the fixed radial branches. If any αi=0, its field is the identity and every factor involving it equals 1, reducing the formula to the N−1-field formula. The neutrality condition is for the declared algebraic vacuum functional, not a full scalar path integral.

3.1step 1.3step 1.4step 2.1algebra∎

If α=0, the charge shift is the identity, V0=I, the weight α2/2 is zero, and both OPEs reduce to the identity-field cases; if αβ=0, the scalar vertex factor has no branch because its exponent is zero. If N=1, the functional gives 1 for α1=0 and 0 otherwise, matching the empty product and charge-neutrality rule. These are the zero-charge and one-insertion boundary cases. The example asserts no compactification, winding sectors, or physical path-integral measure.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources