Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-11-05 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Linearized flow of a unit-dimension scalar perturbation

Physical scope

Conditional data-level Wilsonian calculation for a normalized scalar scaling eigenoperator of total dimension one; it stops when the dimensionless coupling leaves the stated linearized regime and makes no global-flow or physical-realization claim.

Example

Condition on declared full local two-dimensional CFT data that contain a normalized scalar scaling eigenoperator O of total dimension Δ=1. This is a data-level example and does not construct such a CFT. Let a0>0 be a reference cutoff length, let the fixed dimensionful coupling λphys∈R have units [length]−1, and set t=log⁡(a/a0) and g(t)=λphysa(t) with a(t)=a0et. The linearized regime is the interval where ∣g(t)∣<ε for a fixed dimensionless tolerance ε>0. The example computes only the engineering beta term in this regime; OPE-induced nonlinear corrections and a later endpoint are not specified.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The cutoff and IR time convention in the Example, and a scalar scaling eigenoperator with Δ=1.

[F1]

Regulated conformal perturbation and beta-function conventions: the dimensionless coupling is g(a)=λphysa2−Δ and t=log⁡(a/a0) increases toward the IR.

[F2]

Linear beta coefficient from the scaling dimension: the engineering beta term is (2−Δ)g in this convention.

[A1]

The background CFT data and the normalized operator are assumed as stated in the Example; no existence theorem for them is used.

Verification

Given: g0=λphysa0 and ∣g0∣<ε.

1.1givenF1A1algebra

Since a(t)=a0et and Δ=1, the definition gives g(t)=λphysa0et=g0et.

2.1givenF2step 1.1algebra

Differentiating the fixed-dimensionful-coupling rescaling gives the engineering term βeng(g(t)):=dg(t)/dt=g0et=g(t), agreeing with (2−Δ)g from [F2]. This is not an equation for the full renormalized beta function: the theorem permits additional O(∣g∣2) terms under its separate second-order remainder hypothesis, and this Example specifies no nonlinear correction.

2.2givenstep 1.1algebra

For g0≠0, the boundary ∣g(t∗)∣=ε is reached at t∗=log⁡(ε/∣g0∣)>0, and ∣g(t)∣<ε for t<t∗. If g0=0, then g(t)=0 for every t and there is no finite exit time.

3.1givenA1step 2.2∎

For nonzero g0, the strict linearized regime is t<t∗; at t=t∗ one has ∣g(t∗)∣=ε, so the boundary point is outside that regime. This calculation supplies no nonlinear continuation or assertion that a full flow reaches another CFT.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources