Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A strictly convex entropy interval with no canonical energies

Example

Take the binary alphabet A={1,0} with uniform reference p=(1/2,1/2) and continuous energy-density map h(q)=q(1)1/4 on Δ(A). With H2(x):=−xln⁡x−(1−x)ln⁡(1−x) and 0ln⁡0:=0, the constrained entropy from the finite-alphabet mean-field model is s(u)=H2(u4)−ln⁡2 for 0≤u≤1. For 0<u≤1/10, s′′(u)=u2[12ln⁡1−u4u4−161−u4]>0. Each such energy lies in an interval of strict convexity and therefore has no affine upper supporting line of any slope. Consequently none of these microcanonical energies is realized by a canonical mean-field ensemble at any β∈R.

Example references

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The binary alphabet, uniform reference, energy map, entropy convention, and the definitions and suppliers listed below.

[F1]

Finite-alphabet mean-field probability ensembles: d(u)=inf⁡h(q)=uD(q∥p), s(u)=−d(u), and the canonical variational objective is D(q∥p)+βh(q).

[F2]

Finite-alphabet mean-field ensembles and upper supporting lines: an energy is canonical at slope β only if s(v)≤s(u)+β(v−u) on the whole energy range.

[F3]

The natural logarithm as the inverse of the exponential function and Order, continuity, range, and the product, quotient, and reciprocal laws for the natural logarithm: ln⁡ is the inverse of exp⁡ on (0,∞), is strictly increasing, and satisfies ln⁡(xy)=ln⁡x+ln⁡y.

[F4]

The natural logarithm has derivative 1/x and equals the integral from 1 to x of 1/t: ln⁡′(x)=1/x for x>0 and ln⁡x=∫1xdt/t.

Verification

1.1givenF1F3algebra

If u=0, then h(q)=0 forces q(1)=0 and q(0)=1, so the constraint fiber is the singleton (0,1). By [F1], D((0,1)∥p)=ln⁡2, and therefore s(0)=−ln⁡2=H2(0)−ln⁡2. If 0<u≤1, then h(q)=u forces q(1)=u4 and q(0)=1−u4, again a singleton fiber. The relative-entropy formula in [F1] gives D(q∥p)=u4ln⁡(2u4)+(1−u4)ln⁡(2(1−u4))=ln⁡2−H2(u4); hence s(u)=H2(u4)−ln⁡2.

2.1F3F4F5step 1.1algebra

For 0<u<1, [F4]–[F5] give H2′(x)=ln⁡((1−x)/x) and therefore s′(u)=4u3ln⁡((1−u4)/u4). Differentiating once more yields s′′(u)=u2B(u), where B(u):=12ln⁡((1−u4)/u4)−16/(1−u4).

3.1F3F4F6step 2.1algebra

On 0<u≤1/9, R(u):=(1−u4)/u4=u−4−1 decreases and 1/(1−u4) increases, so B(u) decreases. At u=1/9, R(u)=6560 and B(1/9)=12ln⁡6560−16⋅6561/6560. Since 6560>16, [F3] gives ln⁡6560>ln⁡16=4ln⁡2; and [F4] gives ln⁡2=∫12dt/t>1/2 because 1/t≥1/2 on [1,2] with strict inequality on [1,2). Thus 12ln⁡6560>24. Also 16⋅6561/6560<17 by integer multiplication, so B(1/9)>7 and B(u)>0 throughout (0,1/9]. In particular s′′(u)>0 on that interval. By applying [F6] first to s′ and then to s, positive second derivative makes s′ strictly increasing and every interior chord lie strictly above the graph; hence s is strictly convex on (0,1/9).

4.1F2step 3.1choosealgebra∎

Fix u∈(0,1/10] and choose t>0 so that 0<u−t<u+t<1/9, possible because 1/10<1/9. Strict convexity from step 3.1 gives s(u−t)+s(u+t)>2s(u). If an upper supporting line with slope β existed at u, its inequalities at u−t and u+t would instead give s(u−t)+s(u+t)≤[s(u)−βt]+[s(u)+βt]=2s(u), a contradiction. By [F2], no such energy is canonical for any real β.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources