Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pending
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Nonzero parallel Maxwell fields satisfy torus constraints with isotropic initial curvature

Example

Fix L0>0 and dimensionless periodic coordinates θi∈R/(2πZ), with length coordinates Xi=L0θi as in Periodic high-Sobolev state spaces. Let h=∑idXi⊗dXi=L02∑idθi⊗dθi on the flat periodic torus T2π3 (thus hij=δij in the length-coordinate frame), take Λ=0, and choose two nonzero vectors with constant components e,b∈R3 in its oriented orthonormal frame ∂Xi parallel to one another. In the SI convention e=E/c and b=B, set H:=κ6μ0(∣e∣2+∣b∣2),Kij:=Hhij, where x0=ct is a length coordinate. Then (h,K,e,b) satisfies the source-free Einstein–Maxwell Hamiltonian, momentum and Gauss constraints with K(X,Y)=g(∇Xn,Y). Consequently, conditional on the local theorem's stated CP01 suppliers, these data have a nontrivial smooth source-free local Einstein–Maxwell development.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The flat torus, Λ=0, constant parallel e,b, and the fixed positive constants κ,μ0.

[L1]

Draft constraint interface Gauss-Codazzi and Maxwell initial constraints is Diei=Dibi=0,R(h)+(tr⁡hK)2−∣K∣h2=2Λ+κμ0(∣e∣h2+∣b∣h2),DjKji−Ditr⁡hK=−κμ0(e×hb)i. Its file is listed in batch 6, but its status is draft and verification precheck is pending, so this constraint use remains conditional.

[F1]

Local high-Sobolev and smooth electrovacuum gives a smooth full local solution from smooth constrained data, conditional on the model, stress and hyperbolic suppliers identified in that item's Facts & Assumptions. The inspected current GR Sobolev suppliers used there are published with precheck pending.

Verification

1.1givenL1algebra

The flat torus has R(h)=0 and zero Christoffel symbols. Constant e,b therefore have Diei=Dibi=0; their collinearity gives e×hb=0. Since K=Hh with constant H, DK=0, tr⁡hK=3H, and ∣K∣h2=3H2. Hence the Hamiltonian left side is 0+9H2−3H2=6H2, which by the definition of H equals κμ0−1(∣e∣2+∣b∣2), exactly the right side of [L1] for Λ=0. The momentum left side and right side both vanish. Thus all four constraints hold. The scalar under the square root is positive since both fields are nonzero, and H is finite and real.

2.1step 1.1F1algebra

The data are smooth and h is uniformly positive on the compact torus. For any integer s≥5 they belong to the Sobolev classes in [F1]; their verified constraints meet its hypotheses. Applying [F1] yields a smooth local full source-free solution. The reconstructed initial two-form has nonzero electric and magnetic components because e,b≠0, so the solution is nontrivial. The argument is a model deduction, not an empirical claim.

3.1givenstep 2.1algebra∎

(A nonzero magnetic period.) The initial spatial two-form is ωb=12ϵijkbk dXi∧dXj=12L02ϵijkbk dθi∧dθj. Write the development from step 2.1 as M=(−T,T)×T2π3 with initial embedding ιΣ(θ)=(0,θ). For each i, choose the cyclic pair (j,k) with ϵijk=1 and orient the coordinate two-torus Tjk2={θi=0} by dθj∧dθk. Its magnetic period, the integral of the restricted two-form, is ∫Tjk2ωb=(2πL0)2bi. Since b≠0 and L0>0, some such period is nonzero. If F=dA for a globally defined smooth one-form on a neighborhood of the full initial torus, then ωb=d(ιΣ∗A). Write ιΣ∗A=∑ℓAℓ(θ)dθℓ with smooth periodic coefficients. Integrating ∂jAk−∂kAj over the coordinate two-torus gives zero by periodicity in each variable, contradicting its nonzero period. Thus no such global potential exists.

Remarks

If instead K=0 while h=δ, Λ=0, and either field is nonzero, the Hamiltonian constraint fails: its left side is zero and its right side is strictly positive. This obstruction distinguishes coupled initial data from a test Maxwell field placed on a fixed Minkowski background. No later isotropy or long-time behavior is claimed for the development above.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources