How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Nonzero parallel Maxwell fields satisfy torus constraints with isotropic initial curvature
Example
Fix and dimensionless periodic coordinates , with length coordinates as in Periodic high-Sobolev state spaces. Let on the flat periodic torus (thus in the length-coordinate frame), take , and choose two nonzero vectors with constant components in its oriented orthonormal frame parallel to one another. In the SI convention and , set where is a length coordinate. Then satisfies the source-free Einstein–Maxwell Hamiltonian, momentum and Gauss constraints with . Consequently, conditional on the local theorem's stated CP01 suppliers, these data have a nontrivial smooth source-free local Einstein–Maxwell development.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The flat torus, , constant parallel , and the fixed positive constants .
Draft constraint interface Gauss-Codazzi and Maxwell initial constraints is Its file is listed in batch 6, but its status is draft and verification precheck is pending, so this constraint use remains conditional.
Local high-Sobolev and smooth electrovacuum gives a smooth full local solution from smooth constrained data, conditional on the model, stress and hyperbolic suppliers identified in that item's Facts & Assumptions. The inspected current GR Sobolev suppliers used there are published with precheck pending.
Verification
The flat torus has and zero Christoffel symbols. Constant therefore have ; their collinearity gives . Since with constant , , , and . Hence the Hamiltonian left side is , which by the definition of equals , exactly the right side of [L1] for . The momentum left side and right side both vanish. Thus all four constraints hold. The scalar under the square root is positive since both fields are nonzero, and is finite and real.
The data are smooth and is uniformly positive on the compact torus. For any integer they belong to the Sobolev classes in [F1]; their verified constraints meet its hypotheses. Applying [F1] yields a smooth local full source-free solution. The reconstructed initial two-form has nonzero electric and magnetic components because , so the solution is nontrivial. The argument is a model deduction, not an empirical claim.
(A nonzero magnetic period.) The initial spatial two-form is . Write the development from step 2.1 as with initial embedding . For each , choose the cyclic pair with and orient the coordinate two-torus by . Its magnetic period, the integral of the restricted two-form, is . Since and , some such period is nonzero. If for a globally defined smooth one-form on a neighborhood of the full initial torus, then . Write with smooth periodic coefficients. Integrating over the coordinate two-torus gives zero by periodicity in each variable, contradicting its nonzero period. Thus no such global potential exists.
Remarks
If instead while , , and either field is nonzero, the Hamiltonian constraint fails: its left side is zero and its right side is strictly positive. This obstruction distinguishes coupled initial data from a test Maxwell field placed on a fixed Minkowski background. No later isotropy or long-time behavior is claimed for the development above.
Depends on
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Sources
- M. Alcubierre, J. C. Degollado and M. Salgado, The Einstein-Maxwell system in 3+1 form and initial data for multiple charged black holes, arXiv:0907.1151v2 (2009), §II, printed pp. 3–8.
- P. T. Chruściel, An introduction to the Cauchy problem for the Einstein equations, Roscoff lecture notes (2011), §1.6, printed pp. 23–25.