How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
One sensor cannot identify two independent coefficients
Example
Let have the ordered basis , and represent a candidate field by the coefficient vector . A single sensor has the linear observation matrix , the weighting covariance is , and a datum is for a fixed realized error . The sensor depends on alone, so it cannot determine on the full two-dimensional coefficient space.
Example references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The two-dimensional coefficient space, the matrix , the scalar weighting covariance , and fixed realized error in the Example.
Identifiability is injectivity of the observation map on the chosen coefficient subspace; a nonzero kernel vector makes distinct coefficients observationally indistinguishable. Whitened observation identifiability and stability
Verification
Given: The hypotheses and notation in the Example.
Direct multiplication gives and , while . Thus is a nonzero vector in the kernel of .
For every and every , linearity gives . Taking any produces a distinct coefficient vector with the same predicted observation and the same realized error ; by [F1], the coefficient vector is not identifiable.