How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Plane and pipe Couette–Poiseuille verification — formal worked fields
Example
Set , , , , , , and in the plane-channel model. The profile is for , with flux and fixed-coordinate wall shear components and . In the pipe, set , , , , and ; the profile is on the unit disk and its volume flux is . These are exact infinite or fully developed formal solutions within the theorem's one-dimensional ansatz.
Example references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Use the exact constant-density equations and the plane-channel and circular-pipe ansatz, domains, endpoint data, and formulas in [A1].
Plane channel: , , , , , , with . Pipe: , , , , , and radial velocity field on the full disk.
Plane and pipe Couette–Poiseuille verification: the channel profile is with the stated flux and shear formulas; the full-disk pipe profile is with flux . Both fields solve the constant-density Navier–Stokes/Stokes equations exactly within their ansatz.
Verification
Substituting the channel parameters into the formula in [F1] gives . It obeys , , and . Integrating gives . Also and , so and .
Substituting the pipe parameters into [F1] gives , which as a Cartesian radial field is , smooth on the full disk and zero at . Polar integration gives . The parameter values are positive where required, so the exact-solution and restricted-uniqueness conclusions of [F1] apply to both displayed fields.