How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Bounded-domain Stokes residual estimate — formal worked field
Example
Assume . Let , define for , and set . Regard fields on as periodic lifts to with periods in , and integrate with Lebesgue measure over one fundamental cell in each periodic coordinate. Set , , and . Then is a smooth divergence-free periodic field with zero trace on both walls and satisfies . Its norms satisfy and , so . This is a formal worked field for the periodic-channel Poincare clause; the general bounded Euclidean residual theorem is not applied to this periodic cell.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The field, periodic channel, positive parameters, residual equation, and assumption in [A1].
, with Lebesgue measure on one fundamental cell, , , , periodicity in , and zero trace at ; assume .
Bounded-domain Stokes residual estimate: on this periodic channel, every field periodic in the torus variables and zero on satisfies . The theorem's global statement carries .
Verification
The field is periodic in and vanishes at because . Its only nonzero component is independent of , so , and . Hence .
Integrating over gives , so . The only nonzero derivative is , whose squared integral gives .
Since , step 1.2 gives . This explicitly verifies the channel inequality in [F1]; the field is only a worked channel residual, not an application of the general-domain residual estimate.