How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Barotropic Kelvin and Bernoulli with exact hypotheses — worked interpretation
Constructed exact barotropic Euler field with specified parameters; not an empirical claim about viscous fluids.
Example
Choose , , , and an open cylinder with radius , half-height . The exact steady density is and , with in metres. On a material circle of radius , . Between and , Bernoulli value changes by ; each circular streamline still has constant value.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: with , , , and the exact solid-rotation field.
Barotropic Kelvin and Bernoulli with exact hypotheses — conditional physical prediction: circulation is and Bernoulli is a constant plus in this smooth barotropic Euler model.
Formal parameterized fluid systems and observables: for a closed piecewise- oriented curve, circulation is . Here the material circle in the plane is for seconds and , with ; and .
Proof
For the radius-one material circle in [F2], its circulation is .
The Bernoulli difference from to is . It is a between-streamline difference; each circle keeps fixed .