How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Barotropic Kelvin and Bernoulli with exact hypotheses — formal worked solution
Example
Let , , for , , , , and . These fields solve the barotropic Euler system. The enthalpy is . Define the Bernoulli quantity by ; here it is the constant . The closed loop is material and has circulation for every .
Example references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Use the classical fields, positive density, equation of state, potential and closed material loop in [A1].
, , , , , , , and for .
Barotropic Kelvin and Bernoulli with exact hypotheses: for classical positive-density barotropic Euler with conservative , ; steady Bernoulli is constant on streamlines, and a closed material loop has constant circulation under the stated mixed-derivative condition.
Verification
The fields have the required smoothness and positive density. Since is constant, ; also , , , and . Thus both barotropic Euler equations hold pointwise. The enthalpy formula in [F1] gives , so and .
The loop is closed because its endpoint values at agree, and ; its spatial and mixed derivatives are continuous. Its tangent is , so . This verifies the theorem's circulation conclusion directly.