Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pendingverified 2026-10-23 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The Bingham graph at zero contains nonzero tensors

Example

Let M3(R) denote the real 3×3 matrices and set S0={D∈M3(R):DT=D,tr⁡D=0}, the space of trace-free symmetric matrices with Frobenius product D:E=tr⁡(DTE) and norm ∣D∣=(D:D)1/2. Let τy>0, let D=0∈S0, and use the Frobenius-norm Bingham graph whose zero-rate value is {τ∈S0:∣τ∣≤τy}. The tensor

S=τy2(1000−10000)

is nonzero, trace-free, and has Frobenius norm τy, so S∈B(0). Thus zero strain rate does not imply zero deviatoric stress in this set-valued Bingham model.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A yield parameter τy>0, the tensor D=0, and the Bingham graph in the Example.

[F1]

Bingham yield graph and convex monotonicity: at D=0, B(0)={τ∈S0:∣τ∣≤τy}.

Verification

Given: The data in the Example and Facts & Assumptions.

1.1givenalgebra

The diagonal entries of S sum to zero, so S∈S0; its squared Frobenius norm is τy2/2+τy2/2=τy2, and S≠0 because τy>0.

2.1F1step 1.1

By [F1] and step 1.1, ∣S∣=τy places S in B(0).

3.1step 1.1step 2.1∎

The pair D=0,τ=S≠0 is therefore an element of the graph, which refutes the implication that zero strain rate forces zero deviatoric stress for this model.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources