Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The relative-velocity decomposition of a boost, checked in an explicit tetrad

Example

Let (R4,g) and the constant boosted tetrad field (E0,E1,E2,E3) be as in A constant boosted tetrad field on flat spacetime and an adapted chart, with E0=n future unit timelike, E1 unit spacelike and g(E0,E1)=0. Let β∈(−1,1), γ=(1−β2)−1/2 and c>0, and set

w:=βc E1,u:=γ(n+wc)=γ(E0+βE1).

Then u is future unit timelike, −g(n,u)=γ≥1, hn(u)=γβE1, w=c hn(u)/γ, and g(w,w)=β2c2=c2(1−γ−2)<c2 whenever β≠0. This verifies the relative-velocity decomposition theorem of the tensors page in an explicit family.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The constant boosted tetrad (E0,E1,E2,E3) on R4 with flat metric g, its first member n=E0, parameters β∈(−1,1), γ=(1−β2)−1/2, c>0, and the vectors w=βcE1, u=γ(n+w/c).

[L1]

The fields E0=γ(∂0+β∂1), E1=γ(β∂0+∂1) satisfy g(E0,E0)=−1, g(E1,E1)=1, g(E0,E1)=0; n=E0 is future-directed; and E2=∂2, E3=∂3 (A constant boosted tetrad field on flat spacetime and an adapted chart).

[L2]

If n is an observer, c>0, u is future unit timelike and γo=−g(n,u), wo=c hn(u)/γo, then γo≥1, u=γo(n+wo/c) and g(wo,wo)=c2(1−γo−2) (Relative velocity decomposition of a future unit timelike vector).

[L3]

An observer is a future-directed unit timelike vector; the spatial projection is hn(v)=v+gp(n,v)n (Observers, rest spaces and the spatial projection at an event), and a nonzero causal vector v is future-directed exactly when g(v,N)<0 (Smooth time-oriented Lorentzian four-manifolds: the geometric objects of the model).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1L1L3algebra

Since g(n,n)=−1, g(E1,E1)=1 and g(n,E1)=0 by [L1], bilinearity gives g(u,u)=γ2(g(n,n)+2βg(n,E1)+β2g(E1,E1))=γ2(−1+β2)=−1, so u is unit timelike. Moreover g(n,N)=g(E0,∂0)=−γ and g(E1,∂0)=−γβ by [L1], so g(u,N)=γ(g(n,N)+βg(E1,N))=−γ2(1+β2)<0; by [L3] the vector u is future-directed.

2.1step 1.1L1L3algebra

By [L3] and [L1], hn(u)=u+g(u,n)n=u−γn=γ(E0+βE1)−γE0=γβE1. Moreover g(u,n)=γ(g(n,n)+βg(E1,n))=−γ, since g(n,E1)=0; hence γo:=−g(n,u)=γ and wo:=c hn(u)/γo=cβE1=w.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1L2algebra∎

The identities u=γ(n+w/c) and g(w,w)=β2c2 hold by definition of w and [L1]; since γ−2=1−β2, we have g(w,w)=c2(1−γ−2)<c2 for β≠0, while for β=0 the vector w vanishes and u=n. Thus the explicit pair (γ,w) is exactly the decomposition produced by [L2] for u, and γ≥1.

Remarks

The example is the flat-spacetime boost written in the abstract split of a single tetrad: no coordinate chart enters, and the only data are the observer n, the spatial direction E1, the speed parameter β and the conversion constant c.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources