Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-11-05 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Wrapped-tension check at string coupling three

Physical scope

Formal positive-parameter illustration of the conditional wrapped-tension identity at g_s=3; not a measurement, vacuum, or existence claim.

Statement

Choose formal parameters gs=3, ℓs=L>0, and α′=L2. Under the conditional circle dictionary, R11=3L and ℓp3=3L3. With the adopted leading M2 and M5 tensions, one wrapping gives 2πR11TM2=12πL2=TF,2πR11TM5=13(2π)4L5=TD4. This is a symbolic parameter check under the stated postulates, not an observed value or a claim that a string/M-theory vacuum with these parameters exists.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The parameter assignment in the statement and the conditional theorem below.

[F1]

The current circle dictionary gives R11=gsℓs and ℓp3=gsℓs3 (M Theory Type IIA Circle Limit Dictionary).

[F2]

The tension postulate gives TM2=(2π)−2ℓp−3 and TM5=(2π)−5ℓp−6 (M2 M5 tension normalizations).

[F3]

The Dp action gives TD4=μ4/gs with μ4=((2π)4α′5/2)−1 at constant dilaton (Type II Dp Brane DBI WZ Action); this example uses only its DBI tension clause.

[F4]

The string-tension definition gives TF=1/(2πα′) and α′=ℓs2 (String Tension Alpha Prime).

[F5]

The A-page theorem states the two wrapped-tension identities under the same conditional dictionary and one-wrap hypotheses (Wrapped M2 and M5 tensions match the IIA string and D4 tensions).

[A1]

The values gs=3 and ℓs=L>0 are chosen formal parameters, not measured data or a specified solution.

Proof

Given: [F1]–[F5], [A1], and the definitions α′=L2, gs=3.

1.1givenA1F1algebra

Substitution into [F1] gives R11=gsℓs=3L and ℓp3=gsℓs3=3L3, hence ℓp6=9L6.

2.1F2F4step 1.1algebra

Using [F2], 2πR11TM2=(6πL)(2π)−2(3L3)−1=12πL2=TF.

2.2F1F2F3A1step 1.1algebra

Using [F2], 2πR11TM5=(6πL)(2π)−5(9L6)−1=13(2π)4L5. By [F3] and α′=L2, TD4=((2π)4gsℓs5)−1=1/(3(2π)4L5), so the second equality follows.

3.1A1F5step 2.1step 2.2∎

The two direct calculations agree with the conditional identities in [F5]. Positivity L>0 makes every inverse finite; this arithmetic supplies no existence statement for a physical background.

Remarks

This example checks one non-unit coupling value and displays the cancellation of gs for the wrapped M2 and the surviving gs−1 in the D4 tension. It remains conditional on the source-reported dictionary.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources