How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Wrapped-tension check at string coupling three
Formal positive-parameter illustration of the conditional wrapped-tension identity at g_s=3; not a measurement, vacuum, or existence claim.
Statement
Choose formal parameters , , and . Under the conditional circle dictionary, and . With the adopted leading M2 and M5 tensions, one wrapping gives This is a symbolic parameter check under the stated postulates, not an observed value or a claim that a string/M-theory vacuum with these parameters exists.
Statement References
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The parameter assignment in the statement and the conditional theorem below.
The current circle dictionary gives and (M Theory Type IIA Circle Limit Dictionary).
The tension postulate gives and (M2 M5 tension normalizations).
The Dp action gives with at constant dilaton (Type II Dp Brane DBI WZ Action); this example uses only its DBI tension clause.
The string-tension definition gives and (String Tension Alpha Prime).
The A-page theorem states the two wrapped-tension identities under the same conditional dictionary and one-wrap hypotheses (Wrapped M2 and M5 tensions match the IIA string and D4 tensions).
The values and are chosen formal parameters, not measured data or a specified solution.
Proof
Given: [F1]–[F5], [A1], and the definitions , .
Substitution into [F1] gives and , hence .
Using [F2],
Using [F2], By [F3] and , , so the second equality follows.
The two direct calculations agree with the conditional identities in [F5]. Positivity makes every inverse finite; this arithmetic supplies no existence statement for a physical background.
Remarks
This example checks one non-unit coupling value and displays the cancellation of for the wrapped M2 and the surviving in the D4 tension. It remains conditional on the source-reported dictionary.