Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Entropy-divergence example

Example

Let wn:={0,n∈{0,1},1C n (log⁡n)2,n≥2,C:=∑n≥21n(log⁡n)2, where log⁡ is the natural logarithm. This example verifies concretely that:

(a) the normalizing constant is finite and positive, C∈(0,∞), so that ∑n≥0wn=1 (Series and absolute convergence in a normed space);

(b) the entropy of the weight family diverges, s(w):=−∑n≥0wnlog⁡wn=∑n≥0wnlog⁡1wn=+∞, where the sum is the nonnegative extended sum of the nonnegative terms wnlog⁡(1/wn); for a zero weight, both expressions −wnlog⁡wn and wnlog⁡(1/wn) are defined to have value 0. Thus the two zero weights at n=0,1 contribute 0 rather than requiring a logarithm or reciprocal at zero;

(c) Consequently, a probability weight on a countable set can have infinite entropy, while every finite probability vector p=(p1,…,pd) with pi≥0 and ∑ipi=1 has entropy sd(p):=−∑i:pi>0pilog⁡pi≤log⁡d (zero entries contribute 0). The finite bound is verified below.

Verification

Given: the weight family (wn)n∈N and the constant C defined above.

[F1] Cauchy condensation: for a nonnegative nonincreasing family (ak)k≥1, ∑k≥1ak converges if and only if ∑j≥02ja2j converges (For a nonincreasing nonnegative sequence, ∑ak converges iff ∑2ka2k converges).

[F2] p-series: ∑k≥1k−p converges if and only if p>1; in particular ∑k≥1k−2<∞ and ∑k≥1k−1=∞ (The p-series for a real exponent p converges exactly when p is greater than one).

[F4] The natural logarithm is continuous, strictly increasing and onto R, satisfies log⁡1=0, the product and reciprocal laws, and is inverse to the real exponential (Order, continuity, range, and the product, quotient, and reciprocal laws for the natural logarithm, The natural logarithm as the inverse of the exponential function).

1.1F1F2F3algebra

[Finiteness of C] The family ak:=1/(k(log⁡k)2), k≥2, is nonnegative and nonincreasing for k≥3 (the denominator k(log⁡k)2 is increasing by [F3] applied to log⁡), so condensation [F1] applied to the tail from k≥2 reduces ∑k≥2ak to ∑j≥12ja2j=∑j≥12j2j(log⁡2j)2=1(log⁡2)2∑j≥11j2, which converges by [F2]; the finitely many terms with k=2 do not affect convergence. Since every term is positive, C∈(0,∞) and therefore ∑nwn=C/C=1.

1.2F1F2algebra

[Divergence of the comparison series] Again by [F1], ∑k≥31klog⁡k converges if and only if ∑j≥22j2jlog⁡(2j)=1log⁡2∑j≥21j converges, which fails by [F2] with p=1; hence ∑k≥31/(klog⁡k)=+∞.

1.3F3F4algebra

[The entropy lower bound] Put R:=max⁡(0,−12log⁡C). Since log⁡ is onto, choose x0>0 with log⁡x0=eR; for every integer n≥max⁡{2,x0}, monotonicity gives log⁡n≥eR and then log⁡log⁡n≥R. Thus log⁡C+2log⁡log⁡n≥0. By the product and reciprocal laws [F4], log⁡1wn=log⁡C+log⁡n+2log⁡log⁡n≥log⁡n>0 for all such n, and wnlog⁡1wn≥1Cn(log⁡n)2log⁡n=1Cnlog⁡n.

2.1step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3algebra

[Divergence of the entropy] Since all terms wnlog⁡(1/wn) are nonnegative, the extended sum s(w)=∑n≥0wnlog⁡(1/wn) dominates any finite partial sum; by step 1.3 it dominates 1C∑N≤n≤M1nlog⁡n for all large N≤M, and step 1.2 shows that these partial sums are unbounded as M→∞. Hence s(w)=+∞, proving (b) and, with step 1.1, the countable-set claims (a)-(b).

3.1F3F4step 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

[The finite-dimensional entropy bound] Let S:={i:pi>0} and k:=∣S∣, so 1≤k≤d. For every x≥1, [F3] gives log⁡x≤x−1; for 0<x<1, put y=1/x>1 and use [F3] with [F4] to get log⁡x=−log⁡y≤−(1−1/y)=x−1. Therefore, using the logarithm laws [F4] and ∑i∈Spi=1, sd(p)−log⁡d=∑i∈Spilog⁡1dpi≤∑i∈Spi(1dpi−1)=kd−1≤0. This proves the finite-dimensional bound in (c); together with steps 1.1-2.1 it establishes (a)-(c).

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources