Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite Wick quadratic pairing

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Assume the Axiom of Choice and let Q∼N(0,C) be a centered scalar Gaussian with variance C≥0.

[A1]

The finite-dimensional normal-law suppliers explicitly assume the Axiom of Choice. The Axiom of Choice

[F1]

A centered scalar normal with covariance C is a one-dimensional instance of the multivariate normal law. Multivariate normal law, including singular covariance

[F2]

The finite covariance Wick definition gives :Q2:C=Q2−C. Finite covariance Wick normal powers

[F3]

The Gaussian pairing formula gives E[Q2]=C and E[Q4]=3C2. Finite Gaussian normalization and Wick moments

Example

For a finite centered Gaussian coordinate, the expectation of the product of two Wick-subtracted quadratic powers is

E[(:Q2:C)(:Q2:C)]=2C2.

Verification

technique · expand the finite polynomials and apply the fourth-moment pairing formula

Given: C≥0 and [A1].

1.1F2algebra

By [F2], (:Q2:C)(:Q2:C)=(Q2−C)2=Q4−2CQ2+C2.

2.1A1F1F3step 1.1algebra∎

Taking expectations and substituting [F3] gives 3C2−2C⋅C+C2=2C2. This also holds at the degenerate endpoint C=0, where the law is concentrated at zero. The Gaussian law is available under the stated Choice hypothesis [A1].

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources