How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Entanglement threshold versus thermodynamic singularity
The zero-field, antiferromagnetic finite Pauli dimer at its exact thermal separability boundary. It distinguishes a state-property threshold from a thermodynamic singularity and makes no experimental claim.
Example
For the zero-field dimer of Interacting Heisenberg dimer Gibbs model with , the equality point gives a separable Gibbs density matrix, and every larger gives an entangled one. Nevertheless and the free energy remain analytic at this threshold. The threshold changes the separability classification without producing a finite-temperature thermodynamic singularity.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , , , and the exact finite dimer result.
Interacting Heisenberg dimer Gibbs model: at zero field the Gibbs state is separable for and entangled above, while its finite partition and free energy are analytic for positive .
Verification
Substituting into [F1] gives the separable equality state; taking any gives the entangled branch. These are conclusions about the defined two-qubit density matrix.
At , is a finite positive sum of exponentials, so is analytic for , including at the separability threshold. Therefore this state-property boundary is not a thermodynamic singularity of the finite dimer.