How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Ekpyrotic/cyclic contracting cosmology proposal
Conditional four-dimensional Einstein-frame canonical-scalar contracting model. It proves the exact exponential-potential branch and linear homogeneous Bianchi-I shear suppression for c^2>6; it asserts no nonsingular bounce, global string realization, or perturbation transfer.
Example
Use natural units , and call Einstein-frame when the gravitational action has the constant coefficient multiplying its Ricci scalar. Let have mass dimension and be positive, smooth and dimensionless. The flat FLRW metric is , with . For a canonical scalar, meaning kinetic density , set and , and define where . For the linear homogeneous Bianchi-I deformation , , , and , define directional rates and shear components . With and of mass dimension one, of mass dimension four, and a dimensionless potential slope (not the speed of light), the potential with gives a contracting branch with and suppresses this linear homogeneous shear relative to the scalar density. A proposed bounce and perturbation transfer require additional premises and are not consequences of this calculation.
Use natural units . The Einstein-frame FLRW line element is on , with signature , of mass dimension , and dimensionless smooth scale factor . Let be a homogeneous canonical scalar, a mass, of mass dimension four, and a dimensionless potential slope. Then has mass dimension four, has mass dimension one, and is dimensionless. Adopt [A1] with . The exhibited ekpyrotic branch contracts toward . For the shear calculation, the Bianchi-I metric is , with , , and only terms linear in the smooth homogeneous retained; shear-energy backreaction is omitted at this order. This is a formal classical Einstein-scalar model: no EFT cutoff or omitted-mode bounds are supplied, and no controlled string compactification or validity at is asserted. Bounce dynamics, perturbation matching/transfer, and moduli stabilization are additional missing inputs; no bounce or perturbation spectrum is asserted.
Example references
Facts & Assumptions
Alternative string-cosmology model data: A datum states its metric frame, action and fields, background branch, initial and boundary data, transition prescription, perturbation/transfer information, and control regime; an absent bounce or transfer is not inferred.
Adopt the four-dimensional Einstein-scalar action , the tensor equations and , with no other matter or cosmological constant. Here , , and . Use and , summing repeated Greek indices from 0 to 3. These are adopted model equations in the displayed action normalization, not a claimed derivation of the gravitational action. For homogeneous , they give and . Define and . The FLRW equations are , , and . For the shear calculation use the Bianchi-I metric with , , , , and no anisotropic stress. Keep only linear order in ; the shear-energy backreaction is quadratic.
Verification
Given: [A1], , , , and .
Put , so , and choose and by . The dimensions are mass and , so and are dimensionless. For , set and . Then , , , and .
For the Bianchi-I metric, the only nonzero connection coefficients from [A1] are and (no sum over ). In the Ricci formula, the derivative term is , the connection trace product is , and the last two nonzero products total ; spatial derivatives vanish. Thus and . The homogeneous stress in [A1] has equal spatial diagonal entries, so this difference vanishes. Write , with . The pairwise equations make all equal; their sum is zero, so each is zero. Consequently is constant on the interval and . These identities hold for the exact diagonal homogeneous equations; in the stated perturbation calculation retain to first order and its squared amplitude to second order, while evaluating and on the unperturbed branch.
The expressions in step 1.1 give . Also and ; substituting gives . Thus the prescribed contracting branch solves the adopted flat-FLRW equations.
Its pressure is , so . Since as , the background scalar density scales as .
Comparing this linearized homogeneous shear with the FLRW background density from step 3.1 gives during contraction because . This proves suppression of the stated shear mode only; it does not prove nonlinear stability to every anisotropy or a controlled bounce.
On any smooth canonical-scalar FLRW segment, [A1] gives . Therefore cannot pass from to on such a segment. A bounce requires an additional premise or a different regime, consistent with the source's statement that the ekpyrotic bounce is a separate unresolved construction.