Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-11-04 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Ekpyrotic/cyclic contracting cosmology proposal

Physical scope

Conditional four-dimensional Einstein-frame canonical-scalar contracting model. It proves the exact exponential-potential branch and linear homogeneous Bianchi-I shear suppression for c^2>6; it asserts no nonsingular bounce, global string realization, or perturbation transfer.

Example

Use natural units ℏ=clight=1, and call g Einstein-frame when the gravitational action has the constant coefficient MP2/2 multiplying its Ricci scalar. Let t,xi have mass dimension −1 and a be positive, smooth and dimensionless. The flat FLRW metric is ds2=−dt2+a(t)2δijdxidxj, with H:=a˙/a. For a canonical scalar, meaning kinetic density −12gμν∂μϕ∂νϕ, set ρϕ:=ϕ˙2/2+V and Pϕ:=ϕ˙2/2−V, and define w:=Pϕ/ρϕ where ρϕ≠0. For the linear homogeneous Bianchi-I deformation dsBI2=−dt2+∑i=13ai(t)2(dxi)2, ai=aeβi, βi∈C2(I), and ∑iβi=0, define directional rates Hi:=a˙i/ai and shear components σi:=Hi−H. With ϕ and MP of mass dimension one, V0 of mass dimension four, and c a dimensionless potential slope (not the speed of light), the potential V=−V0e−cϕ/MP with c2>6 gives a contracting branch with w>1 and suppresses this linear homogeneous shear relative to the scalar density. A proposed bounce and perturbation transfer require additional premises and are not consequences of this calculation.

Use natural units ℏ=clight=1. The Einstein-frame FLRW line element is ds2=−dt2+a(t)2δijdxidxj on I=(−∞,0), with signature (−,+,+,+), t,xi of mass dimension −1, and dimensionless smooth scale factor a>0. Let ϕ∈C2(I,R) be a homogeneous canonical scalar, MP>0 a mass, V0>0 of mass dimension four, and c a dimensionless potential slope. Then V(ϕ)=−V0e−cϕ/MP has mass dimension four, H=a˙/a has mass dimension one, and w=Pϕ/ρϕ is dimensionless. Adopt [A1] with c2>6. The exhibited ekpyrotic branch contracts toward t=0. For the shear calculation, the Bianchi-I metric is dsBI2=−dt2+∑i=13ai(t)2(dxi)2, with ai=aeβi, ∑iβi=0, and only terms linear in the smooth homogeneous βi retained; shear-energy backreaction is omitted at this order. This is a formal classical Einstein-scalar model: no EFT cutoff or omitted-mode bounds are supplied, and no controlled string compactification or validity at t=0 is asserted. Bounce dynamics, perturbation matching/transfer, and moduli stabilization are additional missing inputs; no bounce or perturbation spectrum is asserted.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Alternative string-cosmology model data: A datum states its metric frame, action and fields, background branch, initial and boundary data, transition prescription, perturbation/transfer information, and control regime; an absent bounce or transfer is not inferred.

[A1]

Adopt the four-dimensional Einstein-scalar action S=∫d4x−g(MP22R−12gμν∂μϕ∂νϕ−V(ϕ)), the tensor equations MP2Gμν=Tμν and □gϕ−V,ϕ=0, with no other matter or cosmological constant. Here Tμν:=∂μϕ∂νϕ−gμν(12gαβ∂αϕ∂βϕ+V), Gμν:=Rμν−12gμνgαβRαβ, and □gϕ:=gμν(∂μ∂νϕ−Γαμν∂αϕ). Use Γαμν=12gαβ(∂μgβν+∂νgβμ−∂βgμν) and Rμν=∂αΓαμν−∂νΓαμα+ΓααβΓβμν−ΓανβΓβμα, summing repeated Greek indices from 0 to 3. These are adopted model equations in the displayed action normalization, not a claimed derivation of the gravitational action. For homogeneous ϕ, they give T00=−ρϕ and Tij=Pϕδij. Define ρϕ=ϕ˙2/2+V and Pϕ=ϕ˙2/2−V. The FLRW equations are 3MP2H2=ρϕ, H˙=−ϕ˙2/(2MP2), and ϕ¨+3Hϕ˙+V,ϕ=0. For the shear calculation use the Bianchi-I metric dsBI2=−dt2+∑i=13ai(t)2(dxi)2 with ai=aeβi, a=(a1a2a3)1/3, βi∈C2(I), ∑iβi=0, and no anisotropic stress. Keep only linear order in βi; the shear-energy backreaction is quadratic.

Verification

Given: [A1], V=−V0e−cϕ/MP, V0>0, c2>6, and t<0.

1.1givenA1algebra

Put p=2/c2, so 0<p<1/3, and choose a0>0 and A>0 by A2=V0/[p(1−3p)MP2]. The dimensions are [A]= mass and [Aτ]=1, so a0 and Aτ are dimensionless. For τ=−t>0, set a(t)=a0(Aτ)p and ϕ(t)=(2MP/c)log⁡(Aτ). Then H=p/t<0, ϕ˙=2MP/(ct), K=ϕ˙2/2=pMP2/t2, and V=−p(1−3p)MP2/t2.

1.2givenA1algebra

For the Bianchi-I metric, the only nonzero connection coefficients from [A1] are Γ0ii=ai2Hi and Γi0i=Γii0=Hi (no sum over i). In the Ricci formula, the derivative term is ∂t(ai2Hi)=ai2(H˙i+2Hi2), the connection trace product is ai2Hi∑kHk, and the last two nonzero products total −2ai2Hi2; spatial derivatives vanish. Thus Rii=H˙i+Hi∑kHk and Gii−Gjj=H˙i−H˙j+3H(Hi−Hj). The homogeneous stress in [A1] has equal spatial diagonal entries, so this difference vanishes. Write σi=Hi−H=β˙i, with ∑iσi=0. The pairwise equations make all σ˙i+3Hσi equal; their sum is zero, so each is zero. Consequently a3σi=Ci is constant on the interval and σ2:=12∑iσi2=12∑iCi2a−6. These identities hold for the exact diagonal homogeneous equations; in the stated perturbation calculation retain σi to first order and its squared amplitude to second order, while evaluating a and ρϕ on the unperturbed branch.

2.1A1step 1.1algebra

The expressions in step 1.1 give K+V=3p2MP2/t2=3MP2H2. Also ϕ¨=−2MP/(ct2) and V,ϕ=−(c/MP)V; substituting p=2/c2 gives ϕ¨+3Hϕ˙+V,ϕ=0. Thus the prescribed contracting branch solves the adopted flat-FLRW equations.

3.1A1step 2.1algebra

Its pressure is Pϕ=K−V, so w=Pϕ/(K+V)=(2p−3p2)/(3p2)=2/(3p)−1=c2/3−1>1. Since a→0 as t→0−, the background scalar density ρϕ=3MP2H2 scales as a−2/p=a−c2.

4.1F1step 3.1step 1.2algebra

Comparing this linearized homogeneous shear with the FLRW background density from step 3.1 gives σ2/ρϕ∝ac2−6→0 during contraction because c2>6. This proves suppression of the stated shear mode only; it does not prove nonlinear stability to every anisotropy or a controlled bounce.

5.1F1A1step 2.1algebra∎

On any smooth canonical-scalar FLRW segment, [A1] gives H˙=−ϕ˙2/(2MP2)≤0. Therefore H cannot pass from H<0 to H>0 on such a segment. A bounce requires an additional premise or a different regime, consistent with the source's statement that the ekpyrotic bounce is a separate unresolved construction.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources