Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-11-04 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

String axiverse candidates and cosmological production channels

Physical scope

Source-backed family of conditional axion and axion-like-particle cosmologies. It does not assert that every compactification contains an observed axiverse, determine an abundance, or establish a globally controlled string vacuum.

Example

Consider a declared compactification EFT with at least two retained periodic axion coordinates. For the Type IIB realization described in the cited source, let Y be a specified compact six-dimensional internal space, let [ΣA]∈H4(Y;Z) be chosen integral four-cycle classes, and let C4 be the Ramond–Ramond four-form gauge potential. The angular coordinate θA=(qA∫ΣAC4) mod 2π is the normalized period on a chosen cycle representative, with the normalization qA and large-gauge identifications supplied as model data. Other compactifications must supply their own internal space, gauge-potential degree, cycle classes and period normalizations. In every case specify the joint positive-definite kinetic matrix, charge lattice and separate source-generated potential for each mode.

For the cold-matter branch, require a nonzero homogeneous mode that is a decoupled canonical eigen-coordinate with a positive time-independent mass for each member of a controlled family satisfying every hypothesis of A homogeneous harmonic axion has a controlled averaged cold-matter limit, including its member-dependent-mass, small-Hn/ma,n, total-variation, and admissible-window limits; after a specified reheating history, the mode then has the theorem's leading averaged cold-matter limit. For any other populated mode, use a specified spatially flat FLRW chart with metric ds2=−dt2+a(t)2δijdxidxj, a>0, and unit comoving observer n=∂t. A spatial Fourier mode eik⋅x has constant comoving wave vector k and physical momentum magnitude k/a(t) measured by n, where k=∣k∣. A mode with physical momentum much greater than its mass is relativistic; a mode with momentum much less than its mass is nonrelativistic. For a homogeneous hidden perfect-fluid component with density ρD measured by n, impose pD=ρD/3 and separate conservation ρ˙D+3H(ρD+pD)=0, H=a˙/a. Then d(a4ρD)/dt=a4(ρ˙D+4HρD)=0, so its energy density redshifts as a−4; call such a component dark radiation. Here a modulus means a retained real scalar coordinate of the compactification, and modulus decay means decay of its excitation through separately specified couplings; this may instead produce a relativistic or nonrelativistic axion population, depending on the decay kinematics and history.

When inflationary perturbations are included, use a declared two-field trajectory ϕI(t) with positive field-space metric GIJ and Hubble rate HHub:=a˙/a. Put σ˙=(GIJϕ˙Iϕ˙J)1/2>0, σ^I=ϕ˙I/σ˙, choose a G-unit vector s^I orthogonal to σ^I, and let QI=δϕI+(ϕ˙I/HHub)ψ be the source's gauge-invariant Mukhanov–Sasaki field perturbation, where ψ is the scalar spatial-metric perturbation on equal-time slices. In the source convention define R=HHubσ^IQI/σ˙ and S=HHubs^IQI/σ˙; S is the single independent linear isocurvature mode in this two-field limit. Which branch occurs depends on cycle data, masses, initial angles and perturbations, decay channels and thermal history. Here an axiverse means a model with multiple axion-like modes and distinct field parameters. This is a source-backed family of possibilities, not a universal abundance or a claim that every compactification produces an observed axiverse.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A compactification-specific four-dimensional EFT datum, at least two axion modes, their periodicities, kinetic matrix, integer charges, instanton actions and phases, initial conditions, and a stated cosmological and reheating history. For the cold-matter branch, the selected single mode is a decoupled canonical eigen-coordinate with a positive time-independent mass for each family member, and its nonzero homogeneous solutions, harmonic range, negligible transfer/backreaction, background family and centered windows satisfy every joint limit in [F2].

[F1]

Periodic axion EFT data and sources: each periodic coordinate, fixed-patch canonical normalization, source charge/action/phase and periodic potential are explicit; a harmonic approximation is a separate model input.

[F2]

A homogeneous harmonic axion has a controlled averaged cold-matter limit: the actual item gives the leading cold-matter limit for one homogeneous canonical mode with a positive harmonic mass constant in time for each family member, the source-free oscillator equation, negligible transfer/backreaction, the stated joint adiabatic/total-variation limits, and centered windows. Its local proof now establishes positive instantaneous reference energy by ODE uniqueness; the theorem's current Step 1 decision remains escalated only for the averaged-dust supplier's separate transitive plan-interface issue.

[F3]

Reheating temperature in a sudden-decay modulus model assumes a smooth spatially flat FLRW datum M=J×Σ, g=−dt2+a(t)2γ, a homogeneous canonical quadratic scalar, and smooth homogeneous comoving radiation-fluid data (ρr,pr,n) with ρr≥0, pr=ρr/3 and n=∂t. Their additive stress is the only Einstein source, with zero cosmological term. With H(td−)=Γ, complete instantaneous transfer and immediate thermalization, any positive TRH matching π2g∗(TRH)TRH4/30 to the pre-decay total density obeys the stated formula. No averaged-dust limit is required for this temperature algebra. Every use of the sudden-decay branch here assumes this additional smooth metric, scalar, comoving radiation datum, and energy-transfer prescription; it is not a consequence of specifying axion periods or masses.

[F4]

The source-backed axion reviews distinguish production from an initial angular displacement from a potential minimum (misalignment), relativistic axions and defect/modulus production; they state that masses, isocurvature and abundances depend on the compactification and post-inflationary history (Marsh, arXiv:1510.07633v2, §§2.4, 3.3.4, 4.3; Cicoli et al., arXiv:2303.04819v2, §§5.5, 5.7.2–5.7.4). For a Type IIB example, Cicoli et al., arXiv:2607.27361v1, §2 gives the four-cycle C4 periods; its §5.1 defines QI, the adiabatic/isocurvature projections, and the two-field S convention stated above.

Verification

1.1givenF1

Choosing two angular coordinates, their kinetic matrix and their source/charge data instantiates the data required by [F1]. This choice does not fix the compactification geometry or imply that either nonperturbative source is realized; those remain explicit inputs.

2.1givenF2F3F4step 1.1

Under the full cold-matter-branch assumptions in Given, the selected mode matches the actual hypotheses of [F2], so its conditional conclusion is only the leading cold-matter limit. For a sudden-decay branch, [F3] additionally requires all its smooth FLRW metric, scalar and comoving radiation-fluid data with pr=ρr/3, additive total stress, the adopted flat-FLRW Einstein law, H(td−)=Γ, complete instantaneous energy transfer and immediate thermalization; the temperature formula does not calculate an axion abundance. The source-supported relativistic and defect-produced branches in [F4] likewise require their own initial conditions and decay history.

3.1givenF1F4step 2.1∎

Since no cycle volumes, source amplitudes, portal rates, complete isocurvature likelihood, or entropy-injection history are fixed here, neither an abundance nor a universal observational conclusion follows. This verifies the example's stated model-family scope.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources