Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Worked Fermi-Walker transport along uniformly accelerated hyperbolic motion

Example

In an inertial chart with metric diag⁡(−1,1,1,1) let α>0 and consider the smooth worldline x:R→A with inertial coordinates x(τ)=c2α(sinh⁡(ατ/c),cosh⁡(ατ/c),0,0), parametrized by τ; write θ:=ατ/c. Its derivatives are U:=x′=c(cosh⁡θ,sinh⁡θ,0,0) and A:=U′=α(sinh⁡θ,cosh⁡θ,0,0), and one computes η(U,U)=c2(−cosh⁡2θ+sinh⁡2θ)=−c2, η(A,A)=α2(−sinh⁡2θ+cosh⁡2θ)=α2 and η(U,A)=cα(−cosh⁡θsinh⁡θ+sinh⁡θcosh⁡θ)=0; thus τ is a proper-time parameter (up to an additive constant) and U is the four-velocity of a uniformly accelerated worldline. Put X0:=U/c=(cosh⁡θ,sinh⁡θ,0,0) and X1:=(sinh⁡θ,cosh⁡θ,0,0); then η(X0,X0)=−1, η(X0,X1)=0 and η(X1,X1)=1, so (X0,X1) is an orthonormal pair. A direct substitution into the Fermi-Walker rule shows that both are Fermi-Walker transported: X0′=A/c equals 1c2(η(A,X0)U−η(U,X0)A)=1c2(0+cA)=A/c, and X1′=αcX0 equals 1c2(η(A,X1)U−η(U,X1)A)=1c2(αU−0)=αcX0. Moreover X1 is not parallel transported, since X1′=αcX0≠0 for α>0; Fermi-Walker transport therefore differs from parallel transport for accelerated motion. The norm η(X1,X1)=1 is constant along the worldline, an instance of the preservation clause of Fermi-Walker transport preserves the metric, and explicit rigid and non-rigid observer congruences, and adjoining the constant fields ∂y,∂z gives a Fermi-Walker transported orthonormal tetrad (U/c,X1,∂y,∂z) along the hyperbolic worldline.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An inertial chart of the affine Minkowski model with η=diag⁡(−1,1,1,1) (Inertial frames and inertial charts of the affine Minkowski model, Oriented time-oriented affine Minkowski space (the spacetime primitives)), the number α>0, the curve x(τ)=c2α(sinh⁡θ,cosh⁡θ,0,0) with θ=ατ/c, and the fields U=x′, A=U′, X0=U/c, X1=(sinh⁡θ,cosh⁡θ,0,0) of the Example (Four-velocity and four-acceleration of a future timelike worldline).

[L1]

Fermi-Walker transport (Fermi-Walker transport along a timelike worldline clauses (a),(b),(c)): in a proper-time parametrization (so the derivative of the proper-time function is 1), a C1 field X along a C2 future timelike worldline is Fermi-Walker transported exactly when X′=1c2(η(A,X)U−η(U,X)A); the four-velocity U is always Fermi-Walker transported; and on an interval where A=0 the rule coincides with parallel transport, which in the flat model means X′=0.

[L2]

Preservation and tetrads (Fermi-Walker transport preserves the metric, and explicit rigid and non-rigid observer congruences clause (a), Existence, uniqueness and linearity of Fermi-Walker transport): Fermi-Walker transport preserves η(X,Y) for transported pairs; and the unique transported family with initial values a tetrad whose first vector is U/c is an orthonormal observer-adapted tetrad at every parameter.

[L3]

Four-velocity and proper time (Four-velocity and four-acceleration of a future timelike worldline, Proper time along a future timelike worldline, Norms of four-velocity and four-acceleration, and the observer rest-space decomposition clauses (a),(b)): for a C1 future timelike worldline parametrized by proper time, U=x′ satisfies η(U,U)=−c2 and, when x is C2, η(U,A)=0; conversely a parameter is a proper-time parameter exactly when −η(x′,x′)=c along the curve.

[L4]

Hyperbolic functions and the chain rule: cosh⁡2s−sinh⁡2s=1, cosh⁡s>0, sinh⁡′=cosh⁡, cosh⁡′=sinh⁡ (The six hyperbolic functions and their natural domains, Addition formulas, identities, parity, and derivatives of the hyperbolic functions), and differentiation of the composite τ↦(sinh⁡θ(τ),cosh⁡θ(τ)) with θ=ατ/c uses the chain rule (The chain rule, in one line from Carathéodory: if g is differentiable at c and f is differentiable at g(c), then f∘g is differentiable at c with (f∘g)′(c)=f′(g(c)) g′(c)).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1L3L4algebra

Derivatives and causal character: by [L4], x′(τ)=c2α⋅αc(cosh⁡θ,sinh⁡θ,0,0)=c(cosh⁡θ,sinh⁡θ,0,0)=U, so U is C1 and x is C2; further U′=c⋅αc(sinh⁡θ,cosh⁡θ,0,0)=α(sinh⁡θ,cosh⁡θ,0,0)=A. Evaluating the diagonal form, η(U,U)=c2(−cosh⁡2θ+sinh⁡2θ)=−c2, so x is future timelike with U future (time component ccosh⁡θ>0) and τ is a proper-time parameter by [L3]; η(A,A)=α2(cosh⁡2θ−sinh⁡2θ)=α2 and η(U,A)=cα(−cosh⁡θsinh⁡θ+sinh⁡θcosh⁡θ)=0; in particular A≠0 because α>0.

2.1step 1.1L4

Orthonormal pair: X0=U/c=(cosh⁡θ,sinh⁡θ,0,0) and X1=(sinh⁡θ,cosh⁡θ,0,0) satisfy η(X0,X0)=−cosh⁡2θ+sinh⁡2θ=−1, η(X0,X1)=−cosh⁡θsinh⁡θ+sinh⁡θcosh⁡θ=0 and η(X1,X1)=−sinh⁡2θ+cosh⁡2θ=1 by [L4]; and X0′=U′/c=A/c.

2.2L1step 1.1L4

X1 is Fermi-Walker transported: X1′=αc(cosh⁡θ,sinh⁡θ,0,0)=αcX0, and 1c2(η(A,X1)U−η(U,X1)A)=1c2(αU−0)=αcX0, because η(A,X1)=α(−sinh⁡2θ+cosh⁡2θ)=α and η(U,X1)=c(−cosh⁡θsinh⁡θ+sinh⁡θcosh⁡θ)=0 by [L4]; the right-hand side equals X1′, so X1 is transported.

3.1L1step 1.1step 2.1

X0 is Fermi-Walker transported: by [L1] and steps 1.1-2.1, 1c2(η(A,X0)U−η(U,X0)A)=1c2(0−(−c)A)=A/c=X0′, because η(A,X0)=η(A,U)/c=0 and η(U,X0)=η(U,U)/c=−c.

3.2L1L2step 2.2

Difference from parallel transport and norm preservation: X1′=αcX0≠0 since α>0 and X0≠0, so X1 is not parallel transported by [L1]; Fermi-Walker transport therefore differs from parallel transport along this accelerated worldline. The norm is preserved: η(X1,X1)=1 is constant, in agreement with the preservation clause [L2].

4.1L1L2step 2.1step 3.1step 2.2

Tetrad: the constant fields ∂y=(0,0,1,0) and ∂z=(0,0,0,1) have ∂y′=∂z′=0 and η(A,∂y)=η(U,∂y)=0, likewise for ∂z, so the right-hand side of the Fermi-Walker rule vanishes and both are transported by [L1]. Hence (U/c,X1,∂y,∂z)=(X0,X1,∂y,∂z) is an orthonormal tetrad every member of which is Fermi-Walker transported, as asserted in the Example; this also realizes the observer-adapted tetrad of [L2].

5.1step 3.1step 2.2step 3.2step 4.1∎

Conclusion: steps 1.1-2.1 verify the kinematic data, steps 3.1 and 2.2 verify that both legs X0=U/c and X1 satisfy the Fermi-Walker rule, step 3.2 exhibits the nonzero derivative X1′=αcX0 showing that Fermi-Walker transport is not parallel transport for α>0, and step 4.1 completes the transported orthonormal tetrad. All identities are exact evaluations in the hyperbolic functions and the diagonal form.

Remarks

  • Why the correction term matters. The Fermi-Walker rule subtracts exactly the acceleration-dependent term c−2(η(A,X)U−η(U,X)A); along this worldline the term rotates X1 at the rate α/c while keeping X0 transported, which is what makes the pair (X0,X1) a nonrotating orthonormal frame in the Fermi-Walker sense.

  • Uniform acceleration. The worldline has constant acceleration magnitude η(A,A)=α and lies in the region x02<x12; the example uses only the local differential identities and no horizon or coordinate-singularity statement, which belongs to the accelerated-observers page.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources