How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Worked motion of the primed frame's origin under a passive boost
Example
Worked computation. Let be a passive boost with parameter along the first spatial direction of an inertial frame with coordinates (The passive Lorentz boost with parameter beta); in matrix expressions write and for the transformed coordinates. Then:
(i) the locus of the primed coordinates (with fixed) is, in the unprimed chart, with fixed constants. The primed spatial origin is the case ; arbitrary fixed transverse coordinates give parallel loci: indeed forces , and the transverse coordinates are unchanged because fixes them. With this is uniform motion with coordinate velocity along ;
(ii) conversely the unprimed origin satisfies , since when ; so the unprimed frame moves with parameter in the primed chart, consistent with ;
(iii) for the concrete values are in the first chart and in the second; the locus passes through the event and through (choosing ), which the boost maps to , confirming .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An inertial frame with coordinates , a parameter , and the boost ; write .
For the boost acts by and , with , and it fixes the transverse coordinates: , ; the Euclidean norm is that of the frame's spatial coordinates (The passive Lorentz boost with parameter beta, The Euclidean inner product on ).
is a proper orthochronous Lorentz map and ; the maps are injective in (The passive boost is a proper orthochronous Lorentz map with inverse B(-beta)).
An inertial frame has -orthonormal basis with , and its chart is affine (Inertial frames and inertial charts of the affine Minkowski model).
Fix a real constant and define the reparametrized temporal coordinate , so . Coordinate velocity means the derivative with respect to this coordinate. This rescaling makes no assertion about physical clock readings or the empirical value or SI units of .
For every proper orthochronous linear Lorentz map and every the tuple is an inertial frame whose chart satisfies , where (Inertial charts are related by proper orthochronous affine Lorentz maps, and every such map is a chart transition).
Proof
By [L1], and , so holds exactly when ; the equations , of [L1] show that the transverse coordinates are arbitrary constants, unchanged by the boost. Under the convention of [L4], the locus is , that is, uniform motion along with coordinate velocity .
For the unprimed origin set (with ). [L1] gives and , so in the primed coordinates the unprimed origin moves along the locus . This is consistent with [L2]: applying the inverse boost to a point with gives , so the inverse map sends that locus to the unprimed origin, as requires.
Finally, the transformed coordinates are the coordinates of an inertial chart of the model: by [L2] the map is proper orthochronous, so [L5] applied with provides an inertial frame whose chart is , where denotes the boost matrix and for every event , using and . Thus the worked motion is the motion of the primed inertial chart's spatial origin in the unprimed chart, and conversely; the computation uses only the boost formulas and the affine chart structure.
For one has ; step 1.1 gives the locus and step 1.2 gives . The event satisfies , so it lies on the locus, and [L1] gives and ; the origin is fixed because the boost is linear. Hence the displayed values of clause (iii) are correct.
Steps 1.1-1.2 and 2.1 verify clauses (i)-(iii) of the Example and step 1.3 identifies the primed coordinates with an inertial chart; every assertion is a finite computation with the displayed rational values.
Depends on
The passive Lorentz boost with parameter beta
The passive boost is a proper orthochronous Lorentz map with inverse B(-beta)
Inertial frames and inertial charts of the affine Minkowski model
The Euclidean inner product on
Inertial charts are related by proper orthochronous affine Lorentz maps, and every such map is a chart transition
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Sources
- B. Crowell, Special Relativity, revision 2020-12-10 (author-published undergraduate textbook), Section 1.4 'The Lorentz transformation' pp. 30-32 including Examples 11-14, Sections 2.3-2.4 'Additional postulates'/'Other axiomatizations' pp. 46-49, and Section 8.3 'Boosts and rotations' pp. 174-176; signature (+---) converted to (-+++) with x^0 = ct restored
- S. M. Carroll, Lecture Notes on General Relativity, arXiv:gr-qc/9712019v1 (1997), Chapter 1 'Special relativity and flat spacetime' pp. 3-7 (PDF pp. 10-14), equations (1.3)-(1.21)