Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Worked example: proper time and four-velocity of a straight worldline at beta = 3/5

Example

Worked computation. In an inertial chart with η0=diag⁡(−1,1,1,1) let c>0 and, for t∈R, consider the coordinate worldline x(t)=(ct,(3c/5)t,0,0), parametrized by coordinate time, which describes a clock moving along the first spatial axis with speed 3c/5. Then x′(t)=(c,3c/5,0,0) and η(x′,x′)=−c2+(9/25)c2=−(16/25)c2, so −η(x′,x′)=4c/5 and τ(t)−τ(t0)=(4/5)(t−t0): the moving clock runs slow by the factor 4/5=1/γ with γ=5/4. The four-velocity is U=x′/τ′=(5/4)(c,3c/5,0,0)=(5c/4,3c/4,0,0), which satisfies η(U,U)=−25c2/16+9c2/16=−c2, and the four-acceleration vanishes because U is constant: A=0. The dimensionless four-velocity is u=U/c=(5/4,3/4,0,0); the split of clause (d) with n=e0 gives γ=5/4 and relative velocity w=(0,3c/5,0,0)∈e0⊥, whose spatial coordinates are exactly the coordinate velocity.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An inertial chart with η0=diag⁡(−1,1,1,1) a real c>0, and the worldline x:R→A with coordinates x(t)=(ct,(3c/5)t,0,0).

[L1]

Inertial charts (Inertial frames and inertial charts of the affine Minkowski model): in an inertial chart the matrix of η is diag⁡(−1,1,1,1) and the chart's observer is e0.

[L2]

Curves (Curves, regular causal curves and future timelike worldlines in affine Minkowski space): the difference quotients of x are identically (c,3c/5,0,0), so x′(t)=(c,3c/5,0,0); the sign of η(x′,x′) decides the causal character (Timelike, null, spacelike and causal vectors of a Lorentz vector space).

[L3]

Proper time (Proper time along a future timelike worldline): for a constant tangent x′ the increment is c−1(t−t0)−η(x′,x′).

[L4]

Four-velocity and four-acceleration (Four-velocity and four-acceleration of a future timelike worldline): U=x′/τ′, and A=U′/τ′ when x is C2; a constant U has zero derivative.

[L5]

Decomposition (Norms of four-velocity and four-acceleration, and the observer rest-space decomposition): clauses (a), (c), (d): η(U,U)=−c2; for the observer e0, γ=−η(e0,u) and the relative velocity is w=c h(u)/γ=(0,wsp) when u=γw(c,w)/c.

[L6]

Bilinearity (Lorentz forms of inertia (3,1,0) on a 4-dimensional real vector space): in the chart, η(v,v)=−(v0)2+(v1)2+(v2)2+(v3)2.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1givenL1L2L6

The difference quotients of x are identically (c,3c/5,0,0), so x′(t)=(c,3c/5,0,0); by [L6], η(x′,x′)=−c2+9c2/25=−(16/25)c2<0, so x is a C1 future timelike worldline by [L2].

2.1step 1.1L3

By [L3] the proper-time increment is τ(t)−τ(t0)=c−1(t−t0)⋅(4c/5)=(4/5)(t−t0), so the moving clock's proper time runs at the rate 4/5=1/γ with γ=5/4.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1L4L5L6

The four-velocity is U=x′/τ′=(5/4)(c,3c/5,0,0)=(5c/4,3c/4,0,0); it is constant, so A=U′/τ′=0 by [L4]; and η(U,U)=−25c2/16+9c2/16=−c2 by [L6], in agreement with clause (a) of [L5].

4.1step 3.1L5∎

The dimensionless four-velocity is u=U/c=(5/4,3/4,0,0) with η(u,u)=−1; the split of clause (d) of [L5] with n=e0 gives γ=−η(e0,u)=5/4, h(u)=u−u0e0=(0,3/4,0,0) and relative velocity w=c h(u)/γ=(0,3c/5,0,0), whose spatial coordinates are exactly the coordinate velocity of the worldline; the Lorentz-factor identity ∣w∣2=c2(1−γ−2)=c2(1−16/25)=9c2/25 holds.

Remarks

  • All numbers are exact rationals. The computation uses only the diagonal form of η and the rational values 3/5, 4/5, 5/4; no numerical approximation and no measurement is involved.

  • The factor 1/γ is a model statement. That the moving ideal clock runs slow by 4/5 is a statement about the model's proper time, not a reported measurement of any physical clock.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels