Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Residual entropy in a finite canonical model

Physical scope

A finite discrete Gibbs preparation with a specified energy gap and entropy convention, using a positive Kelvin-valued canonical parameter; no identification with an entropy-derived macroscopic temperature, macroscopic entropy postulate, or empirical material is assumed.

Example

Let X={1,…,N} be a finite set of microstates with energy values Ei in joules. Let E0=min⁡iEi, let exactly g≥1 states have energy E0, and suppose every other state has energy at least E0+Δ for one fixed gap Δ>0 joules. For T>0 kelvins, use T as the positive parameter in this finite canonical model and adopt the probabilities wi(T)=exp⁡ ⁣(−Ei−E0kBT),Z(T)=∑i=1Nwi(T),pi(T)=wi(T)Z(T) and the model entropy SG(T)=−kB∑i=1Npi(T)log⁡pi(T). Then lim⁡T↓0SG(T)=kBlog⁡g. This is a calculation for the adopted finite statistical model, not a deduction of the canonical preparation from macroscopic thermodynamics.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The finite state set, its energy values, the positive gap, T>0, and the specified canonical probabilities and entropy in the Example.

[F1]

SI quantities and unit conventions: kB>0 has units J K−1, so each exponent is dimensionless and SG is in J K−1.

[F2]

Entropic temperature, pressure, and molar chemical potentials: The macroscopic thermodynamic temperature Tc is the entropy-derived state function 1/Sc,U on a designated open chart. The canonical parameter T here is not identified with that function; the Gibbs probabilities are adopted as a separate finite model.

[F3]

The natural logarithm as the inverse of the exponential function: log⁡ is the natural logarithm with domain (0,∞).

[F4]

Order, continuity, range, and the product, quotient, and reciprocal laws for the natural logarithm: log⁡ is continuous and strictly increasing, and log⁡(1/x)=−log⁡x for x>0.

[F5]

The exponential tends to +∞ at +∞ and to 0 at −∞: exp⁡(x)→0 as x→−∞.

[F6]

The logarithm grows more slowly than every positive real power: log⁡x/x→0 as x→+∞.

Verification

1.1givenF1F2F5algebra

In the limit of the stipulated canonical parameter T↓0 [F2], each excited state i∉G:={i:Ei=E0} has (Ei−E0)/(kBT)→+∞, so wi(T)→0 by [F5]. Ground-state weights are 1. Since there are finitely many states, Z(T)→g, each ground-state probability tends to 1/g, and each excited-state probability tends to 0.

2.1F1F3F4step 1.1algebra

By continuity of log⁡ at 1/g>0 from [F4], the total ground-state contribution to entropy tends to −kBg1glog⁡(1/g)=kBlog⁡g.

2.2F3F4F6step 1.1algebra

For an excited state with pi(T)→0, set x=1/pi(T)→+∞. By [F4], pilog⁡pi=−log⁡(x)/x, which tends to 0 by [F6]. The finite sum of excited-state contributions therefore tends to 0.

3.1F1F4step 2.1step 2.2algebra∎

Combining the ground and excited contributions in the finite sum gives SG(T)→kBlog⁡g. In the g=1 case this limit is 0; for g>1 it is positive because log⁡ is strictly increasing and log⁡1=0.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources