Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A finite-step geometric cooling protocol

Physical scope

An abstract update-map model with a Kelvin-valued scalar state coordinate and one finite-duration operation repeated finitely many times; the coordinate is not identified with an entropy-derived thermodynamic temperature, and the result is not evidence about actual cooling devices.

Example

Fix T∗>0 kelvins, an initial state coordinate Tin∈D+:=(0,T∗], a dimensionless ratio r∈(0,1), and an operation duration τ∗>0 seconds. The model state is the scalar coordinate T with state set D‾:=D+⊔D0, where D0:={0}; T is assigned units of kelvins. This abstract coordinate is not identified with the entropy-derived thermodynamic temperature Tc=1/Sc,U of Entropic temperature, pressure, and molar chemical potentials. Each admitted operation is the partial map f:D+→D+, f(T):=rT, with duration τ∗. An admitted finite protocol is a finite composable chain of these operations; write TN for its endpoint after N updates. Since the operation has codomain D+, this restricted model has no operation with endpoint in D0; the proof below is a direct property of its update rule, not evidence for the physical unattainability postulate. It does not assert that a real refrigerator or every thermodynamic model has this update rule.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The stipulated state sets, initial temperature, operation map, and fixed finite duration in the Example.

[F1]

SI quantities and unit conventions: Temperature is measured in kelvins and duration in seconds.

[F2]

Entropic temperature, pressure, and molar chemical potentials: The framework's thermodynamic temperature is the entropy-derived state function Tc=1/Sc,U on a designated open chart; the scalar coordinate T in this example is stipulated separately and is not identified with Tc.

[F3]

The natural numbers N (von Neumann): A finite chain has a length N∈N.

[F4]

The principle of mathematical induction: A property holding at 0 and preserved from N to N+1 holds for every N∈N.

[F5]

Ordered field: Products of positive reals are positive, and multiplying positive inequalities preserves order.

Verification

1.1givenF3base

Let P(N) mean that the endpoint after N admitted operations lies in D+. For N=0, the endpoint is the stipulated Tin>0, so P(0) holds.

2.1step 1.1givenF2F3F5algebra

Assume P(N) [IH]. The stipulated operation sends its current model coordinate TN∈D+ to rTN; because 0<r<1, 0<rTN<TN≤T∗, so the next endpoint satisfies P(N+1). This is a property of the stipulated coordinate update, not a consequence for the entropy-derived Tc in [F2].

3.1F1F3F4step 1.1step 2.1algebradischarge-induction∎

By [F4], steps 1.1 and 2.1 imply P(N) for every finite N∈N. Every admitted finite protocol has such a length by [F3], and its duration is Nτ∗<∞ by the stipulated finite τ∗. Since D+∩D0=∅, none reaches zero. This conclusion is only for the stipulated protocol model.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels