Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A nonconstant local-equilibrium temperature field

Physical scope

A stipulated static local-equilibrium field on an open cube; no global equilibrium, transport law or observation is asserted.

Example

Use the one-coordinate convention of The Euclidean inner product ⟨x,y⟩=∑k<nxkyk on Rn explicitly: ι:R→R1 sends a to the function on {0} with value ι(a)(0)=a, and the inverse takes the coordinate at index zero. In every scalar display below, a one-coordinate parameter or field is written through this bijection. Thus Z means ι((0,∞)), the scalar formula for z denotes its ι image, C(e,y)=e means C(e,y)=ι(e), c(a)=a is the identity on Z, and q(ι(a))=(a,0); temperature and inequalities use the scalar coordinate a. This is a notation convention, not a set-theoretic identity between a real and a function.

Take O=(0,L)3 in metre coordinates and I=(0,τ) in second coordinates, with L>0 m and τ>0 s. Choose Θ0>0 K and dimensionless 0<α<1. Instantiate m=1 and the local-state parameter set Z=(0,∞)⊆R1, and define its one-coordinate field z:O×I→Z by

z(x,t)=Θ01 K(1+αx1L),T(x,t)=(1 K)z(x,t)=Θ0(1+αx1L).

For the homogeneous comparison cell, supply X=(0,∞)×R with states (e,y), physical energy (1 J)e, and numerical entropy s(e,y)=ln⁡e−y2, where ln⁡:(0,∞)→R is the natural logarithm of The natural logarithm as the inverse of the exponential function and physical entropy is (1 J K−1)s(e,y). The coordinate y is dimensionless. Set r=1, C(e,y)=e, c(a)=a, and Ba=X for every a∈Z, so the fixed-energy admissible set is Aa={(a,y):y∈R}. Its entropy-maximizing set is Ea={(a,0)}. Define Eeq=⋃a>0Ea and supply q(a)=(a,0); assign this comparison state temperature (1 K)a. Stipulate the local-equilibrium approximation with this map, so the local constitutive state at (x,t) is q(z(x,t)). The field is static and nonconstant; this stipulation is a model assumption, not an assertion that a physical sample realizes the profile.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The local-field convention of Scope of a local-equilibrium continuum branch and the parameters just specified.

[F1]

Scope of a local-equilibrium continuum branch: the local-state field has the displayed domain and its components have continuous first spatial and time partial derivatives; a temperature component is read in kelvins.

[F2]

Scope of a local-equilibrium continuum branch: an entropy-based local-equilibrium model supplies cell states, entropy, retained constraints and conserved-value maps; Ea is the entropy-maximizing subset of Aa={e∈Ba:C(e)=c(a)}, and the supplied map must satisfy q(a)∈Ea. Its pointwise comparison state is q(z(x,t)); attainment is verified for the supplied model rather than inferred from a label.

[F3]

Scope of a local-equilibrium continuum branch: nonconstant temperature fields are permitted in this continuum model; the pointwise comparison-cell criterion alone neither establishes nor excludes equilibrium of the whole system.

[F4]

The natural logarithm as the inverse of the exponential function defines ln⁡:(0,∞)→R, so the supplied cell entropy is finite at every cell state.

[A1]

x has metre coordinates in (0,L)3, Θ0>0 K, dimensionless 0<α<1, m=1, Z=(0,∞)⊆R, and z(x,t)=(Θ0/(1 K))(1+αx1/L) with T=(1 K)z; the cell data X,s,C,c,Ba are exactly those in the Example and q(a)=(a,0); the model stipulates the resulting pointwise local-equilibrium assignment.

Verification

Given: [F1]–[F4] and [A1].

1.1A1algebra

Since 0<x1<L, 1+αx1/L>1, so z(x,t)>Θ0/(1 K)>0 and T(x,t)=(1 K)z(x,t)>Θ0>0 K. The affine formulas are C1 on O×I and meet the field regularity in [F1].

1.2A1algebra

Choose interior points with x1=L/4 and x1=3L/4, keeping the other coordinates fixed. Their temperature difference is Θ0α/2>0, so the field is not constant.

2.1F1F2F3F4A1step 1.1step 1.2algebra∎

For each a>0, [A1] gives Aa={(a,y):y∈R} and s(a,0)−s(a,y)=y2≥0, with equality exactly at y=0. Thus Ea={(a,0)} and q(a)∈Ea, meeting the constrained-maximum criterion in [F2]. The logarithm is finite since a>0. By [F1] and step 1.1, the one-coordinate field has the declared range and regularity, so its supplied comparison state is q(z(x,t)). Steps 1.1–1.2 show that its temperature component is positive and spatially nonconstant; [F3] says this need not describe global equilibrium. No dynamics or experimental outcome is inferred.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels