Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-12
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A bundle connection is local and restricts to open sets

Statement

For a connection on E→M, if two sections agree near p, their covariant derivatives at p agree in every tangent direction. The derivative in direction X depends only on X(p). For every open U⊆M, there is a unique connection on E∣U agreeing with the original on restricted global sections; restrictions to nested open sets compose. Boundary points are included.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A smooth bundle E→M, a connection ∇, a point p where relevant, and an open set U.

[F1]

Directional connection laws hold; the converse proof also constructs plateau cutoffs in interior and boundary charts (Connection laws in directional form).

[F2]

The connection value is a smooth fibrewise linear map TpM→Ep (Connection on a smooth vector bundle).

Proof

1.1F1F2

Suppose s vanishes on a neighbourhood W of p. Take a smooth cutoff χ supported in W with χ(p)=1, using the construction in the proof of [F1]. Since χs=0, the Leibniz rule at any v∈TpM gives 0=∇v(χs)=dχp(v)s(p)+χ(p)∇vs=∇vs. Apply this to the difference of two sections. The direction depends only on its value by [F2]; no assertion that dχp=0 was needed in this vanishing argument.

2.1F1step 1.1construct

For a local section s on U, take a cutoff supported in U and equal to one on a neighbourhood V of p∈U. Extend χs by zero outside U to a global smooth section s~: outside its closed support it is identically zero, so the definitions paste smoothly. Define (∇Us)p=(∇s~)p. Different extensions agree near p, so step 1.1 proves independence. On V, one fixed extension works at every point, making ∇Us smooth. Local functions can be extended by the same cutoff; the global real-linearity and Leibniz laws then imply those laws on U. Thus this is a connection.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1∎

Any other restriction connection is local by step 1.1 applied on U, and agrees on the global extension in step 2.1; hence its value on s at p is forced. This proves uniqueness and, by applying uniqueness twice, composition of restrictions. The empty open set has a unique zero operator. Zero sections and rank-zero bundles give zero derivatives in steps 1.1 and 2.1; rank one and a zero-dimensional base require no modification. A single point is handled with a single cutoff, and the uniquely specified values assemble without a choice of cutoffs for all points.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources