How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Affine blowup algebras: normal form, nonzerodivisors, reducedness, domains
Statement
Let be a commutative ring, let be an ideal and let . Write for the Rees algebra of , graded by the degree of (The Rees algebra of an ideal and the Rees module of a filtered module, Nonnegatively graded rings and modules, homogeneous elements, and twists). The affine blowup algebra is
the degree-zero part of the localization of at the multiplicative set generated by the degree-one element (Multiplicative subsets and the localisation as equivalence classes of fractions). Then:
- the image of in is a nonzerodivisor, , and ;
- if with (The ideal generated by a subset and principal ideals), the homomorphism sending is surjective with kernel the -power torsion;
- if is reduced then is reduced; if is a domain and then is a domain;
- the construction is independent of the generating set and of the representative used for the homogeneous localization, up to canonical -algebra isomorphism.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A commutative ring , an ideal and an element ; the Rees algebra of (The Rees algebra of an ideal and the Rees module of a filtered module), localized at the multiplicative set generated by the degree-one element (Multiplicative subsets and the localisation as equivalence classes of fractions), with grades read in the sense of (Nonnegatively graded rings and modules, homogeneous elements, and twists).
The Rees algebra of an ideal and the Rees module of a filtered module: For an ideal of a commutative ring , the Rees algebra is the graded subring , whose degree- piece is (so ), with .
Multiplicative subsets and the localisation as equivalence classes of fractions: For a commutative ring and a multiplicative subset , the localization has elements written with iff for some ; the operations are and ; every maps to a unit; if the localization is the zero ring.
Nonnegatively graded rings and modules, homogeneous elements, and twists: A nonnegatively graded ring is a commutative ring with ; an element of is homogeneous of degree . In particular the degree-zero part of a -graded ring is closed under addition, multiplication and contains the unit class of the localization, and products of homogeneous elements add degrees.
The ideal generated by a subset and principal ideals: If then every element of is a finite sum with , and conversely each lies in .
Proof
An element of the localization is a class with and ; writing , its degree-zero component is with . Hence the degree-zero part consists of the classes of with and , so that ; for , one has in if and only if for some , because the defining relation is and is a nonzerodivisor of .
The assignment , , is a well-defined injective ring homomorphism: well-defined and injective because in holds exactly when for some , i.e. exactly under the equality criterion of step 1.1; compatible with addition because and with multiplication because the product is . Its image is the -subalgebra generated by the fractions : every is the image of , and conversely every is a finite sum of products of elements of , so is a sum of products of these generators (with coefficients from ). Hence as -algebras and all computations may be performed in .
The element is invertible in , hence a nonzerodivisor on , hence a nonzerodivisor on the subring ; in particular the image of in is a nonzerodivisor. Moreover because , and because for and with one has with ; hence .
The image of lies in , since for and ; thus , and the inclusion induces . Hence , that is, .
Let send to . Its image contains and every ; since is generated by the , every is a finite sum , whence lies in the image; as the image is an -subalgebra of containing all it contains . So is surjective.
If is reduced, then so is the localization , and is a subring of a reduced ring, hence reduced: if in then already in . If is a domain and , then is a nonzero subring of a field (nonzero because with ), hence a domain, and so is its subring .
Localizing at the multiplicative set generated by gives in which is a unit and hence ; the -algebra homomorphism sending is therefore surjective and has zero kernel, because evaluation at identifies the quotient with . Since the image of in is by step 3.3, , and by the defining relation of the localization an element lies in this kernel exactly when for some , i.e. exactly when is -power torsion.
The description of step 2.1 uses only the pair : no generating family is chosen, and a class in is compared with another by the equality criterion of step 1.1, so the use of a particular fraction representative is immaterial. A finite generating family with only produces the presentation of step 3.3, whose kernel is described in step 4.1; the image and hence the algebra are the same for every such family, with the identity of as the canonical isomorphism. Finally, for with the algebras and lie in different localizations of ; the statement asserts no identification between them, and the transition maps between the corresponding charts are supplied separately by the standard-chart theorem.
Remarks
The vanishing of is allowed: if then lies in the multiplicative set generated by and the localization, and hence , is the zero ring, consistently with ; all four assertions then hold trivially. The description is the normal form used in the chart computations of the blowup.