Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-12
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Associated graded quotients are well defined subquotients

Statement

The associated graded quotients of a filtered object exist as subquotients of the ambient object, independently up to unique compatible isomorphism of the monomorphisms representing its subobjects.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A filtered object and two systems of compatible monomorphisms representing its subobjects.

[F1]

For an increasing filtration, gr⁡pA is the cokernel of Fp−1A↪FpA; for a decreasing filtration, gr⁡pA is the cokernel of Fp+1A↪FpA (Associated graded object of a filtered object).

[F2]

Quotients exist in the abelian category and maps preserving subobjects descend uniquely (Spectral sequence subquotient and local lifting calculus).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F2

Choose the specified representatives ip:Mp↪A. Subobject containment gives jp:Mp−1→Mp with ipjp=ip−1. If jpa=jpb, then ip−1a=ip−1b, hence a=b. Thus jp is monic and its cokernel exists, giving the subquotient in [F1].

2.1F1F2step 1.1

For a decreasing filtration choose representatives ip:Mp↪A. The containment Fp+1A⊆FpA gives jp:Mp+1→Mp with ipjp=ip+1. The same monic-cancellation argument as in step 1.1 makes jp monic, so its cokernel is the decreasing associated-graded subquotient. Equivalently, this is step 1.1 after translating by FpA=F−pA.

3.1F2step 1.1step 2.1∎

Replace either system of representatives by a compatible primed system and let u be the compatible isomorphisms. Monicity in A gives upjp=jp′up−1 in the increasing case and upjp=(j′)pup+1 in the decreasing case. By [F2], u and u−1 descend to maps of the respective cokernels. Their composites are identities because they agree with the identities after the epic quotient projections; the same cancellation proves uniqueness. This covers equal adjacent pieces and zero pieces in both conventions.

Source notes

Weibel, Chapter 5, §5.2 pp.122–125 and Definitions 5.4.2–4 pp.132–133; Sharifi, §4.1 pp.87–89 and Definition 4.2.1 p.90.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources