Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-11-04 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Off-critical affine Shapovalov factors and strong linkage

Statement

Let M(λ) be an untwisted affine Verma module including the derivation, with t=λ(K)+h∨≠0. Write Q=⨁i=0ℓZαi and Q+=⨁i=0ℓZ≥0αi for the affine root lattice and its positive cone, and n^− for the negative-root subalgebra. Define P:Q→Z≥0 by P(β)=dim⁡U(n^−)−β for β∈Q+ and P(β)=0 otherwise. Equivalently, P(β) counts ordered PBW monomials of total root degree −β, using one generator per member of a basis of each negative root space; thus root-space multiplicities are included and P(0)=1. At depth β∈Q+ its contravariant Gram determinant is Dβ(λ)≐taβ∏γ∈Δ^+re∏m≥1(⟨λ+ρ^,γ∨⟩−m)P(β−mγ),aβ∈Z≥0. Every fixed-depth product is finite. In particular a positive integral shifted real-root pairing gives an actual Verma embedding. The off-critical Jantzen filtration defined below satisfies the real-root sum formula, and every simple highest subquotient of M(λ) is strongly linked by positive-integral real-root reflections. A homomorphism from a simple affine Verma into a Verma has dimension at most one. The formula leaves the irrelevant critical exponent aβ unspecified.

For the filtration, take A=C[[u]] and choose ϵ∈h^∗ with ⟨ϵ,γ∨⟩≠0 for every positive real root γ with ⟨λ+ρ^,γ∨⟩∈Z>0. Such a direction is supplied by ϵ=ρ^, normalized by ⟨ρ^,αi∨⟩=1: every positive real coroot is a nonzero nonnegative integral combination of simple coroots. Let Aλ+uϵ be the rank-one module for the positive Borel over A, on which the positive-root algebra acts by zero and h acts by λ(h)+uϵ(h). Set MA=(U(g^)⊗CA)⊗U(b^+)⊗CAAλ+uϵ. Its root-degree pieces are finite free A-modules. Let SA be the symmetric contravariant form given by the Harish-Chandra projection and Chevalley anti-involution in Proof 1.1, evaluated at λ+uϵ, with highest-vector norm one. For j≥0 put MAj={v∈MA:SA(v,MA)⊆ujA} and JjM(λ)=(MAj+uMA)/uMA⊆MA/uMA=M(λ). Then J1M(λ) is the radical of Sλ and, coefficientwise as formal weight characters, ∑j≥1ch⁡JjM(λ)=∑γ∈Δ^+rem=⟨λ+ρ^,γ∨⟩∈Z>0ch⁡M(λ−mγ),ch⁡V=∑ν(dim⁡Vν)eν. Each coefficient in both sums is finite. Here strong linkage means that a simple highest subquotient of highest weight μ admits a finite chain λ=λ0,…,λs=μ with λi+1=λi−miγi=sγi(λi+ρ^)−ρ^, γi∈Δ^+re and mi=⟨λi+ρ^,γi∨⟩∈Z>0; the empty chain is allowed.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The objects, normalizations and hypotheses in the Statement.

[F1]

Kac moody verma module is induced from the positive Borel. Poincaré–Birkhoff–Witt theorem applies to the supplied ordered affine basis and gives the polynomial associated graded algebra.

[F2]

Generalized kac moody casimir is central and scalar on highest weight modules applies to these restricted highest modules and gives the scalar (η,η+2ρ^). The sum is pointwise finite.

[F3]

Untwisted affine central extension gives the loop central extension. Degree derivation and full untwisted affine algebra adjoins d with [d,xm]=mxm; Null root, central coroot, and affine level gives h^=h⊕CK⊕Cd (writing K=c) and δ(d)=1, δ∣h⊕CK=0. The affine simple root alpha zero is delta minus the highest root gives α0=δ−θ, α0∨=K−θ∨, and the finite simple roots/coroots. Loop and affine GCM presentations are isomorphic identifies these current data with the affine Kac–Moody realization used in [F1–F2]. Real roots mean the Weyl orbit of those simple roots, as in Real and imaginary kac moody roots. In current coordinates their root spaces are gα⊗tn of root α+nδ, and the nonzero imaginary root spaces are h⊗tn of root nδ. Positivity means n>0, or n=0 and α finite positive. The real coroot is α∨+2nK/(α,α): choose [eα,fα]=α∨ and use the normalized loop bracket. Define ρ^ by ρ^(αi∨)=1 and ρ^(d)=0, so ρ^∣h=ρ and ρ^(K)=1+ρ(θ∨)=h∨. These choices fix every affine pairing used below. The choice-free Finite semisimple Cartan, root and string structure gives one-dimensional finite root spaces and the finite Cartan decomposition. Its semisimplicity hypothesis holds for the finite simple algebra: a nonzero solvable ideal would be the whole algebra, whereas a nonabelian simple algebra has derived algebra equal to itself and cannot be solvable. Hence real affine multiplicities are one and nonzero imaginary multiplicities are the finite Cartan rank.

Proof

1.1givenF1F2F3algebra

The affine contravariant form. Choose the ordered basis consisting of a finite root/Cartan basis tensored with integral loop modes, together with K,d. The Chevalley anti-involution fixes the extended Cartan and reverses roots and loop modes. PBW gives the Harish-Chandra projection HC⁡:U→U(h^). Define Sλ(uvλ,vvλ)=HC⁡(τ(u)v)(λ) for u,v∈U(n−). It is normalized and contravariant by the anti-involution; these properties determine it, and transposition gives symmetry. Different weights are orthogonal. Its radical is a submodule avoiding the top line. Every proper submodule is contained in it: move negative words across the pairing; the resulting highest-weight coefficient remains in that proper submodule and is zero. Thus the radical is the maximal proper submodule. Root spaces and each PBW weight space are finite dimensional directly from the untwisted current basis.

2.1givenF1F2F3step 1.1algebra

Simple-source Hom bound from affine growth. Any nonzero homomorphism between affine Verma modules is injective: in the PBW realization it is right multiplication by the nonzero singular-vector polynomial A in U(nminus), whose PBW associated graded is the polynomial algebra on the negative root spaces and hence a domain.

3.1givenF1F2F3step 1.1step 2.1algebra

If a simple Verma M(mu) had two independent embeddings into M(lambda), their images would intersect trivially. A nontrivial intersection would identify both simple images, and their comparison would be an endomorphism of the simple source; such an endomorphism is scalar because its highest line is one-dimensional and generates. Thus two copies of M(mu) would embed as a direct sum. If d=ht(λ−μ), their cumulative PBW dimensions would satisfy 2D(N)≤D(N+d) for all N.

4.1givenF1F2F3step 1.1step 3.1algebra

This is impossible in affine type. There is a constant B with at most B positive-root basis vectors of any principal height j: real roots have the finitely many forms alpha+n delta, imaginary roots n delta have the fixed multiplicity rank(g). For 0<z<1, D(N) <= z^(-N) (1-z)^(-1) product_(j>=1)(1-z^j)^(-B).

5.1givenF1F2F3step 1.1step 4.1algebra

Put z=exp(−s). The logarithm of the product is at most B sum_(m>=1) 1/[m(exp(sm)-1)] <= B pi^2/(6s).

6.1givenF1F2F3step 1.1step 5.1algebra

Taking s=N−1/2 gives D(N)≤Csqrt(N)exp(C′sqrt(N)). But iteration of 2D(N)≤D(N+d), for d>0, gives exponential growth along N+nd. For d=0 the inequality is already impossible. Hence Hom(M(mu),M(lambda)) has dimension at most one when the source is simple. This does not assume that every positive-level Verma contains a simple Verma.

7.1givenF1F2F3step 1.1step 6.1algebra

Preliminary factorization including the critical direction. Choose dual bases in opposite affine root spaces and ordered PBW monomials. At maximal Cartan-polynomial degree, commuting an opposite pair retains its Cartan bracket, while every unmatched or non-Cartan commutator lowers degree. Thus the top homogeneous part of Dβ is nonzero and, up to scalar, is product_(gamma positive) (lambda,gamma)^( mult(gamma) sum_(m>=1) P(beta-m gamma)).

8.1givenF1F2F3step 1.1step 6.1step 7.1algebra

This multiplicity formula counts each occurrence of each root-space basis vector in a PBW monomial. For real roots mult=1. Imaginary-root factors all have the common linear direction (lambda,delta), proportional to lambda(K).

9.1givenF1F2F3step 1.1step 6.1step 8.1algebra

If Dβ(λ)=0, its kernel is part of the Shapovalov radical. Acting by positive roots on a kernel vector stays in the radical and spans a finite-dimensional space of weights above lambda-beta. A highest vector in this space has weight lambda-eta, 0<η≤β. Equality of its generalized Casimir scalar with the original highest scalar gives 2(lambda+rhohat,eta)=(eta,eta).

10.1givenF1F2F3step 1.1step 6.1step 9.1algebra

There are only finitely many eta in that interval. Hence every irreducible determinant factor is one of these affine linear equations: the same elementary polynomial divisibility argument as in the finite proof applies to their finite union. Comparison of leading linear directions forces eta to be proportional to a positive root, because every direction in the top homogeneous determinant comes from a root. A real root is primitive in the affine root lattice, being Weyl-conjugate to an original simple root. Thus η=mγ with positive integer m in a real-root direction, giving the factor ⟨λ+ρ^,γ∨⟩−m. In the imaginary direction η=cδ is isotropic and its equation is exactly t=0. This isolates every possible extra factor on the critical hyperplane; it cannot introduce an unknown off-critical real direction.

11.1givenF1F2F3step 1.1step 6.1step 10.1algebra

Generic real hyperplane and first transverse pairing. Fix a real factor hyperplane H=⟨λ+ρ^,γ∨⟩=m. At a generic point on H omit every other Casimir hyperplane from the preceding argument. These form a countable union of proper affine subspaces. Only η=mγ has an identical Casimir equation on H: proportionality of directions followed by the constant term forces that multiple. Also omit t=0. For μ=λ−mγ, no lower-weight Casimir equation is identical on H: a putative lower η=cγ would require −cm(γ,γ)=c2(γ,γ), impossible for c>0. Therefore M(mu) is simple and the only possible lower singular weight of M(lambda) is mu.

12.1givenF1F2F3step 1.1step 6.1step 10.1step 11.1algebra

Since H is assumed to occur as a factor, the radical is nonzero and contains a singular vector of weight mu. The simple-source Hom bound makes its singular line unique. The embedded M(mu) is the entire radical: a nonzero quotient of the radical by that copy has a highest vector at a minimal remaining depth; the Casimir equation would force that vector back to the already exhausted mu-space. Hence the radical dimension at lambda-beta is P(beta-m gamma).

13.1givenF1F2F3step 1.1step 6.1step 10.1step 12.1algebra

Deform transversely by lambda+u epsilon with ⟨ϵ,γ∨⟩=1. Differentiating the contravariant form on the radical gives a contravariant form on the simple M(mu), so it is either zero or perfect. It cannot be zero on its highest line. If it were, the symmetric Gram equation lets one correct a radical highest vector to u0+u u1 whose Gram pairing vanishes modulo u2. Adjacent higher-weight Gram matrices are invertible, so contravariance makes this corrected vector singular modulo u2. The generalized Casimir would then act on it both by the scalar for lambda+u epsilon and by the scalar for mu+u epsilon. Their first derivatives differ by 2(lambda-mu,epsilon)=m(gamma,gamma)!=0,

14.1givenF1F2F3step 1.1step 6.1step 10.1step 13.1algebra

a contradiction. Thus the derivative pairing is perfect. A block determinant in a basis adapted to the radical shows that the factor order is exactly P(beta-m gamma).

15.1givenF1F2F3step 1.1step 6.1step 10.1step 14.1algebra

Finally compare degrees separately in each real-root linear direction. The preliminary leading homogeneous part gives total degree sum_m P(beta-m gamma) in that direction. Every present real factor has exactly its prescribed exponent, and every absent one has exponent zero. All prescribed exponents are nonnegative; equality of the finite total degrees therefore forces all of them to be present with their prescribed exponents. The unknown imaginary contribution has a different linear direction and cannot absorb any of this degree. This proves the asserted determinant up to a power of t.

16.1givenF1F2F3step 1.1step 6.1step 10.1step 15.1algebra

Embeddings and linkage, without a character-exactness inference. At a generic point on H the radical gives a nonzero singular vector at mu. In fixed PBW coordinates the simultaneous equations eiv=0 at that weight are a finite polynomial matrix in lambda. The maximal minors vanish on a dense subset of H and therefore identically on H. Consequently there is a nonzero singular vector at every point of H, including intersections with other real hyperplanes. This supplies an embedding M(sγ⋅λ) into M(lambda) whenever ⟨λ+ρ^,γ∨⟩=m>0. The map is injective by the PBW domain argument above.

17.1givenF1F2F3step 1.1step 6.1step 10.1step 15.1step 16.1algebra

For a fixed noncritical lambda choose a generic one-parameter deformation over Cu. Its first Jantzen term is the radical because the contravariant form is nondegenerate off the union of the real factor hyperplanes and the critical one. On each finite PBW weight space, diagonal reduction over the DVR shows that the sum of the dimensions of the positive Jantzen layers is the determinant valuation. The displayed determinant therefore gives the coefficientwise identity sum_(j>=1) ch J^j M(lambda) = sum_(gamma real+, m=<lambda+rhohat,gamma-coroot> in Z>0) ch M(lambda-m gamma).

18.1givenF1F2F3step 1.1step 6.1step 10.1step 15.1step 17.1algebra∎

Each coefficient is finite. This identity is used for linkage, not as a proof of a BGG complex's exactness. If an irreducible L(μ),μ⟨λ, occurs, it occurs in J1. Truncate above the fixed depth of mu: there are only finitely many weight vectors, so multiplicities in this truncated highest-weight filtration are finite and additive. Positivity in the identity forces L(mu) to occur in at least one Verma on the right. Its highest weight is strictly below lambda. Induction on ht(lambda-mu) gives a chain of positive-real-root embeddings from lambda to mu. Thus all simple subquotients are strongly linked. In particular they lie in the dot orbit of the integral real-root group.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources